Pass the ACFE Certified Fraud Examiner CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions and answers with Dumpstech

The internal audit function has an important role in evaluating governance, risk management, controls, and fraud risk management activities. Its reporting should include significant risk and control issues, including fraud risks, governance issues, and matters requiring attention from senior management or the board. Therefore, if management does not cooperate with the assessment of fraud risk management, that fact is relevant and should be communicated to the board. Internal audit should not wait until fraud occurs before communicating about fraud risk. It also should not hide fraud audit results from senior management or the board in the name of independence. Fraud communication is not solely a legal department responsibility. Accordingly, option D best reflects the internal audit function’s reporting responsibilities concerning fraud.

In the Understanding Criminal Behavior material, the manual explains that differential reinforcement theory, as summarized by Ronald Akers, holds that people learn social behavior through operant conditioning. Behavior is reinforced when positive rewards are gained or when punishment is avoided. The manual specifically states that behavior is reinforced when positive rewards are gained, which is positive reinforcement, and it is weakened by punishment or loss of reward. It also contrasts punishment with reinforcement by noting that reinforcement accentuates positive behavior, whereas punishment tends only to suppress behavior temporarily unless constantly applied. Because the question asks what strengthens behavior, positive reinforcement is the best and most direct answer under the manual’s discussion of conditioning and reinforcement.

 Definition of Focus Groups:

Focus groups involve small groups of individuals discussing a specific topic under the guidance of a facilitator. This technique is used to gather qualitative insights through direct interaction and observation.

 Why A is Correct:

Observing employee interactions during a focus group provides rich, contextual data about attitudes, understanding, and engagement with fraud awareness training.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B (Surveys):Collect quantitative data but lack interaction and observational opportunities.

C (Anonymous feedback mechanisms):Useful for confidentiality but do not allow observation.

D (Interviews):Individualized and do not involve group dynamics​​.

The ACFE Code of Professional Ethics requires CFEs to act with integrity, competence, and professionalism. It specifically prohibits illegal or unethical conduct, as such conduct discredits the profession and undermines public confidence in fraud examination work. A CFE may provide conclusions based on evidence, provided those conclusions are supported by relevant, reliable, and sufficient facts. A CFE may also give opinions on technical matters, such as internal controls, when qualified to do so. Conflicts of interest require careful handling and disclosure, but the most clearly and explicitly prohibited action in the options is participating in conduct that could be considered unethical. This violates the ethical foundation expected of fraud examiners and threatens the credibility of the examination. Therefore, option C is correct.

Laura’s conduct is best explained by pressure and strain. Strain theory focuses on the stress individuals experience when they desire success, status, or financial achievement but believe they lack legitimate means to obtain it. Laura compares herself with friends who display professional and financial success, then feels frustrated and inadequate. Her fraud is not primarily caused by learning criminal behavior from others, because the facts do not show that her friends taught or encouraged fraud. It is also not simply lack of advancement, because the scenario centers on social comparison and emotional pressure. Environmental stressors is too broad. Laura’s desire to reduce negative feelings and gain social status through misuse of the company credit card fits the pressure-and-strain explanation. Therefore, option D is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Fraud risk assessments can be effectively conducted by internal personnel or external consultants. The key is that they must be conducted objectively and with due professional care. There is no requirement that they be conducted only externally (eliminating A), nor should biases about the improbability of fraud influence the assessment scope (eliminating B). Management involvement can be helpful when balanced appropriately—it should not be unduly limited (eliminating D).

The Fraud Risk Assessment chapter explains that auditors should use the fraud risk assessment to improve audit planning and increase attention to fraud indicators, especially in moderate-to-high risk areas. The manual states that auditors should design procedures that enable them to look for fraud in known high-risk areas, map existing preventive and detective controls to identified fraud risks, and develop reports that incorporate the results of validation and testing of fraud risk controls. It also instructs auditors to maintain an attitude of professional skepticism and remain alert for signs of fraud. Therefore, any suggestion that the audit team should use the process to reduce its awareness of fraud indicators is contrary to the manual’s guidance. Option A is the one that is NOT an appropriate use of the fraud risk assessment.

=============

 Definition of Professional Skepticism:

Professional skepticism requires maintaining a questioning mindset and critically assessing evidence throughout the fraud examination process.

 Why D is Correct:

Professional skepticism ensures that fraud examiners remain vigilant and rely on evidence to conclude whether fraud has occurred or not. It is dispelled only when sufficient evidence supports a clear conclusion.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A:While skepticism is critical, it does not mean refusing to acknowledge credible evidence.

B:Assuming no fraud occurred contradicts the principle of skepticism.

C:Hypotheses should consider the nature of the assignment and available information​​.

Objectives of a Fraud Risk Management Program:

A. Proactively identifying fraud risks:A fundamental goal is to identify and assess potential fraud risks to implement preventative measures.

B. Limiting the damage caused by fraud occurrences:Programs should have mechanisms in place to detect and respond to fraud promptly to minimize harm.

C. Punishing fraud perpetrators:Punishment serves as both a deterrent and a means of reinforcing the organization ' s commitment to ethical behavior.

Comprehensive Objective Coverage:

Effective fraud risk management includes preventative, detective, and corrective measures.

Conclusion:All the listed objectives are essential components of a fraud risk management program.