Pass the ECCouncil CEH v13 312-50v13 Questions and answers with Dumpstech

A Pulse Wave attack is a type of DDoS attack that uses a botnet to send high-volume traffic pulses at regular intervals, typically lasting for a few minutes each. The attacker can adjust the frequency and duration of the pulses to maximize the impact and evade detection. A Pulse Wave attack can exhaust the network resources of the target, as well as the resources of any DDoS mitigation service that the target may use. A Pulse Wave attack can also conceal the attacker’s identity, as the traffic originates from multiple sources that are part of the botnet. A Pulse Wave attack can bypass simple defensive measures, such as IP-based blocking, as the traffic can appear legitimate and vary in source IP addresses.

The other options are less effective or feasible for the attacker’s objectives. A protocol-based SYN flood attack is a type of DDoS attack that exploits the TCP handshake process by sending a large number of SYN requests to the target server, without completing the connection. This consumes the connection state tables on the server, preventing it from accepting new connections. However, a SYN flood attack can be easily detected and mitigated by using SYN cookies or firewalls. A SYN flood attack can also expose the attacker’s identity, as the source IP addresses of the SYN requests can be traced back to the attacker. An ICMP flood attack is a type of DDoS attack that sends a large number of ICMP packets, such as ping requests, to the target server, overwhelming its ICMP processing capacity. However, an ICMP flood attack from a single IP can be easily blocked by using IP-based filtering or disabling ICMP responses. An ICMP flood attack can also reveal the attacker’s identity, as the source IP address of the ICMP packets can be identified. A volumetric flood attack is a type of DDoS attack that sends a large amount of traffic to the target server, saturating its network bandwidth and preventing legitimate users from accessing it. However, a volumetric flood attack using a single compromised machine may not be sufficient to overwhelm the network bandwidth of a major online retailer, as the attacker’s machine may have limited bandwidth itself. A volumetric flood attack can also be detected and mitigated by using traffic shaping or rate limiting techniques. References:

Pulse Wave DDoS Attacks: What You Need to Know

DDoS Attack Prevention: 7 Effective Mitigation Strategies

DDoS Attack Types: Glossary of Terms

DDoS Attacks: What They Are and How to Protect Yourself

DDoS Attack Prevention: How to Protect Your Website

The Heartbleed vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160) is a critical buffer over-read flaw in OpenSSL’s implementation of the TLS heartbeat extension. It allows attackers to read portions of memory from a server using vulnerable versions of OpenSSL.

This exposed sensitive data including:

Usernames and passwords

Session tokens

Private encryption keys

From CEH v13 Study Guide – Module 5: Vulnerability Analysis and Module 6: Malware Threats:

“The Heartbleed vulnerability allowed attackers to extract memory contents from the OpenSSL process, including sensitive materials such as private SSL keys. These private keys are used in the TLS protocol to encrypt and decrypt secure communications. Once compromised, attackers could decrypt communications or impersonate the server.”

Private keys being compromised allow attackers to decrypt HTTPS traffic, impersonate trusted servers, and conduct MITM (Man-in-the-Middle) attacks.

Incorrect Options:

A. Public: Public keys are already shared and not a security risk if disclosed.

C. Shared: Vague term not applicable here.

D. Root: Heartbleed doesn’t directly expose root keys; rather, it leaks application memory including private SSL/TLS keys.

The idle scan could be a communications protocol port scan technique that consists of causing spoofed packets to a pc to seek out out what services square measure obtainable. this can be accomplished by impersonating another pc whose network traffic is extremely slow or nonexistent (that is, not transmission or receiving information). this might be associate idle pc, known as a “zombie”.

This action are often done through common code network utilities like nmap and hping. The attack involves causing solid packets to a particular machine target in an attempt to seek out distinct characteristics of another zombie machine. The attack is refined as a result of there’s no interaction between the offender pc and also the target: the offender interacts solely with the “zombie” pc.

This exploit functions with 2 functions, as a port scanner and a clerk of sure informatics relationships between machines. The target system interacts with the “zombie” pc and distinction in behavior are often discovered mistreatment totally different|completely different “zombies” with proof of various privileges granted by the target to different computers.

The overall intention behind the idle scan is to “check the port standing whereas remaining utterly invisible to the targeted host.”

The first step in execution associate idle scan is to seek out associate applicable zombie. It must assign informatics ID packets incrementally on a worldwide (rather than per-host it communicates with) basis. It ought to be idle (hence the scan name), as extraneous traffic can raise its informatics ID sequence, confusing the scan logic. The lower the latency between the offender and also the zombie, and between the zombie and also the target, the quicker the scan can proceed.

Note that once a port is open, IPIDs increment by a pair of. Following is that the sequence:

offender to focus on -> SYN, target to zombie ->SYN/ACK, Zombie to focus on -> RST (IPID increment by 1)

currently offender tries to probe zombie for result. offender to Zombie ->SYN/ACK, Zombie to offender -> RST (IPID increment by 1)

So, during this method IPID increments by a pair of finally.

When associate idle scan is tried, tools (for example nmap) tests the projected zombie and reports any issues with it. If one does not work, attempt another. Enough net hosts square measure vulnerable that zombie candidates are not exhausting to seek out. a standard approach is to easily execute a ping sweep of some network. selecting a network close to your supply address, or close to the target, produces higher results. you’ll be able to attempt associate idle scan mistreatment every obtainable host from the ping sweep results till you discover one that works. As usual, it’s best to raise permission before mistreatment someone’s machines for surprising functions like idle scanning.

Simple network devices typically create nice zombies as a result of {they square measure|they’re} normally each underused (idle) and designed with straightforward network stacks that are susceptible to informatics ID traffic detection.

While distinguishing an acceptable zombie takes some initial work, you’ll be able to keep re-using the nice ones. as an alternative, there are some analysis on utilizing unplanned public internet services as zombie hosts to perform similar idle scans. leverage the approach a number of these services perform departing connections upon user submissions will function some quite poor’s man idle scanning.

LAN Manager (LM) hashes are legacy password hashing methods used in older Windows systems (including Windows 2000 for backward compatibility). LM hashing works by:

Converting the password to uppercase.

Padding or truncating it to 14 characters.

Splitting it into two 7-character halves.

Using each half as a DES key to encrypt a known constant ("KGS!@#$%").

Therefore, LM hashing uses the DES (Data Encryption Standard) algorithm.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats → Password Storage and LM Hash Structure

Passive reconnaissance focuses on collecting information without directly touching or interacting with the target’s systems. CEH materials stress that any action that sends network traffic to the target—such as scanning, probing, fingerprinting, or enumeration—creates logs and increases the risk of detection. Email headers, however, are considered an excellent source of passive intelligence because they reveal internal IP structures, routing paths, mail server hostnames, internal domain formats, and technology stacks without requiring interaction with the target environment. Since these headers are already in the possession of the ethical hacker through legitimate communication records, examining them does not generate traffic or trigger monitoring systems. SSL certificates and WHOIS data provide valuable external information, but they rarely disclose internal addressing schemes. Active scanning tools, such as Nmap, would immediately violate the requirement to avoid detection. Therefore, analyzing previously received email headers is the most effective and covert method for extracting internal network details during the reconnaissance phase.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

VCloud-based (also known as Cloud-based or Cloud-assisted) antivirus leverages cloud computing to:

Offload detection and analysis to powerful remote servers

Provide real-time updates and threat intelligence

Aggregate data from multiple endpoints to improve detection

This method is efficient, especially for zero-day threats and large-scale protection.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats → Modern Antivirus Technologies

In CEH v13 Module 11: Hacking Wireless Networks, WPA3-Personal is discussed as the latest wireless encryption standard designed to address the weaknesses of WPA2, particularly PSK brute-force vulnerabilities.

Key Features of WPA3-Personal:

Replaces the pre-shared key (PSK) with Simultaneous Authentication of Equals (SAE), also known as the Dragonfly Key Exchange.

SAE performs a zero-knowledge proof which makes it resistant to offline dictionary attacks.

Even if attackers capture the handshake, they cannot use it to brute-force passwords offline.

Option Clarification:

A. WPA3-Personal: Correct – uses SAE instead of PSK.

B. WPA2-Enterprise: Uses 802.1X, not related to SAE.

C. Bluetooth: Wireless protocol but unrelated to SAE or WPA.

D. ZigBee: IoT protocol; unrelated to Wi-Fi security protocols.

While perimeter defenses like firewalls and IPS provide a layer of protection, internal systems (such as network elements) must also be hardened. This includes:

Enforcing strong authentication

Applying regular patches and updates

Conducting vulnerability assessments and security audits

Security should be layered (defense in depth), and reliance on perimeter defense alone is insufficient.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 3: Scanning Networks / Module 18: Incident Response

Quote:

“Internal systems must be hardened with secure configurations and tested regularly. A layered security approach is required even in protected environments.”

Incorrect Options:

B & C. Relying only on perimeter or physical security is not sufficient

D. While backup sites are part of DR, they don’t replace proactive protection

===========

A Boot Sector Virus infects the master boot record (MBR) of the system. When a system boots, it first loads the MBR into memory. A Boot Sector Virus takes advantage of this by moving the original MBR to a different location on the hard disk and writing itself to the original MBR location. This ensures that it is executed first during system startup.

As per CEH v13 course material:

“A boot sector virus infects the master boot record of a hard disk. It moves the original boot sector to a different location on the hard disk and replaces it with its own malicious code. When the computer is booted, the virus loads first and then hands control to the original boot sector code.”

Reference – CEH v13 Study Guide:

Module 06: Malware Threats, Section: “Types of Malware”, Subsection: “Boot Sector Viruses”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A: Describes directory virus behavior, not boot sector.

B: The virus moves MBR on the hard disk, not RAM.

D: Some viruses overwrite MBR, but most preserve the original and move it to another disk location to maintain system operability.

In active session hijacking, after identifying a valid session, the attacker must desynchronize the legitimate communication between the client and the server. To do this, Bob should:

Knock one of the parties offline (typically the client).

Then spoof the session by injecting crafted packets using the guessed sequence number.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 11: Session Hijacking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“After identifying a session and predicting its sequence number, the attacker forces the original user offline, allowing them to assume control over the connection using spoofed packets.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Taking over the session is the ultimate goal, but the necessary step before that is disconnecting the original participant.

B: Sequence prediction is already done.

C: Sequence number has already been guessed.

Appropriately controlling admittance to web content is significant for running a safe web worker. Index crossing or Path Traversal is a HTTP assault which permits aggressors to get to limited catalogs and execute orders outside of the web worker’s root registry.

Web workers give two primary degrees of security instruments

Access Control Lists (ACLs)

Root index

An Access Control List is utilized in the approval cycle. It is a rundown which the web worker’s manager uses to show which clients or gatherings can get to, change or execute specific records on the worker, just as other access rights.

The root registry is a particular index on the worker record framework in which the clients are kept. Clients can’t get to anything over this root.

For instance: the default root registry of IIS on Windows is C:\Inetpub\wwwroot and with this arrangement, a client doesn’t approach C:\Windows yet approaches C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\news and some other indexes and documents under the root catalog (given that the client is confirmed by means of the ACLs).

The root index keeps clients from getting to any documents on the worker, for example, C:\WINDOWS/system32/win.ini on Windows stages and the/and so on/passwd record on Linux/UNIX stages.

This weakness can exist either in the web worker programming itself or in the web application code.

To play out a registry crossing assault, all an assailant requires is an internet browser and some information on where to aimlessly discover any default documents and registries on the framework.

What an assailant can do if your site is defenseless

With a framework defenseless against index crossing, an aggressor can utilize this weakness to venture out of the root catalog and access different pieces of the record framework. This may enable the assailant to see confined documents, which could give the aggressor more data needed to additional trade off the framework.

Contingent upon how the site access is set up, the aggressor will execute orders by mimicking himself as the client which is related with “the site”. Along these lines everything relies upon what the site client has been offered admittance to in the framework.

Illustration of a Directory Traversal assault by means of web application code

In web applications with dynamic pages, input is generally gotten from programs through GET or POST solicitation techniques. Here is an illustration of a HTTP GET demand URL

GET http://test.webarticles.com/show.asp?view=oldarchive.html HTTP/1.1

Host: test.webarticles.com

With this URL, the browser requests the dynamic page show.asp from the server and with it also sends the parameter view with the value of oldarchive.html. When this request is executed on the web server, show.asp retrieves the file oldarchive.html from the server’s file system, renders it and then sends it back to the browser which displays it to the user. The attacker would assume that show.asp can retrieve files from the file system and sends the following custom URL.

GET http://test.webarticles.com/show.asp?view=../../../../../Windows/system.ini HTTP/1.1

Host: test.webarticles.com

This will cause the dynamic page to retrieve the file system.ini from the file system and display it to the user. The expression ../ instructs the system to go one directory up which is commonly used as an operating system directive. The attacker has to guess how many directories he has to go up to find the Windows folder on the system, but this is easily done by trial and error.

Example of a Directory Traversal attack via web server

Apart from vulnerabilities in the code, even the web server itself can be open to directory traversal attacks. The problem can either be incorporated into the web server software or inside some sample script files left available on the server.

The vulnerability has been fixed in the latest versions of web server software, but there are web servers online which are still using older versions of IIS and Apache which might be open to directory traversal attacks. Even though you might be using a web server software version that has fixed this vulnerability, you might still have some sensitive default script directories exposed which are well known to hackers.

For example, a URL request which makes use of the scripts directory of IIS to traverse directories and execute a command can be

GET http://server.com/scripts/..%5c../Windows/System32/cmd.exe?/c+dir+c:\ HTTP/1.1

Host: server.com

The request would return to the user a list of all files in the C:\ directory by executing the cmd.exe command shell file and run the command dir c:\ in the shell. The %5c expression that is in the URL request is a web server escape code which is used to represent normal characters. In this case %5c represents the character \.

Newer versions of modern web server software check for these escape codes and do not let them through. Some older versions however, do not filter out these codes in the root directory enforcer and will let the attackers execute such commands.

In a Windows system, a Security Identifier (SID) uniquely identifies each user and group. The SID format is:

S-1-5-21--

The Relative Identifier (RID) is the last component in the SID string.

According to Microsoft and CEH v13:

RID 500 → Built-in Administrator account

RID 501 → Guest account

RIDs > 1000 → Regular user accounts

In the given image, the SID:

s-1-5-21-1125394485-807628933-54978560-500chang

has a RID of 500, indicating the built-in administrator account.

From CEH v13:

Module 4: Enumeration

Topic: SID Enumeration

CEH v13 States:

“When enumerating Windows systems, the account with RID 500 is always the default Administrator account, unless renamed. Attackers often target this account due to its elevated privileges.”

Incorrect Options:

All others have RIDs not equal to 500 (e.g., 100, 652, 412, etc.)

Spear-phishing is a targeted form of phishing that uses personalized and context-rich information to increase credibility. CEH emphasizes that referencing specific internal projects, financial data, or organizational events significantly raises the success rate when attacking high-value targets such as executives. This tailored approach avoids suspicion and exploits trust more effectively than broad or generic phishing attempts.

Passive sniffing refers to listening to or capturing network traffic without sending any packets or altering the communication stream. The attacker’s system operates in "promiscuous mode" to monitor all traffic flowing through the network segment. This technique is mostly used in environments like hub-based or unencrypted Wi-Fi networks, where traffic is visible to all systems.

According to the CEH v13 Official Courseware, Module 08: Sniffing, under the subsection "Passive Sniffing", the following capabilities are associated with passive sniffing:

Capturing unencrypted credentials (usernames and passwords)

Identifying protocols, services, IP addresses, and hostnames

Monitoring HTTP sessions, cookies, and other clear-text traffic

Gathering detailed information for fingerprinting and enumeration

Exporting traffic to PCAPs for forensic and offline analysis

However, passive sniffing does not involve any active interference with the traffic. Therefore, actions like “modifying and replaying” packets require an attacker to craft and inject packets into the network — this is considered active sniffing or traffic manipulation, which is out of scope for passive techniques.

Thus:

Option A: Valid for passive sniffing (host discovery via captured traffic)

Option B: Invalid for passive sniffing (requires active traffic manipulation)

Option C: Valid (if data is unencrypted)

Option D: Valid (captures traffic for offline review)

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 08: Sniffing

Section: “Passive Sniffing vs Active Sniffing”

Study Guide Pages: Usually found under “Types of Sniffing Techniques”

CEH iLabs/Engage Scenarios: Packet capture and Wireshark lab modules

To start the Computer Management Console from command line just type compmgmt.msc /computer:computername in your run box or at the command line and it should automatically open the Computer Management console.