Spring Sale Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code = simple70
Pass the PECB ISO 27001 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions and answers with Dumpstech
SkyFleet did not submit action plans within the specified deadline and was not recommended for certification. Is this acceptable?
Scenario 1: HealthGenic is a pediatric clinic that monitors the health and growth of individuals from infancy to early adulthood using a web-based medical software. The software is also used to schedule appointments, create customized medical reports, store patients' data and medical history, and communicate with all the [^involved parties, including parents, other physicians, and the medical laboratory staff.
Last month, HealthGenic experienced a number of service interruptions due to the increased number of users accessing the software Another issue the company faced while using the software was the complicated user interface, which the untrained personnel found challenging to use.
The top management of HealthGenic immediately informed the company that had developed the software about the issue. The software company fixed the issue; however, in the process of doing so, it modified some files that comprised sensitive information related to HealthGenic's patients. The modifications that were made resulted in incomplete and incorrect medical reports and, more importantly, invaded the patients' privacy.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
According to scenario 1. to detect (1)____________________________, Antiques should have implemented (2)
During a security audit, security analysts discover that an attacker has been repeatedly querying a black-box machine learning model to infer whether certain sensitive data points were part of the training dataset. By doing so, the attacker was able to determine if a specific individual's data was used in training. What threat does this attack represent?
Scenario 1: NobleFind is an online retailer specializing in high-end, custom-design furniture. The company offers a wide range of handcrafted pieces tailored to meet the needs of residential and commercial clients. NobleFind also provides expert design consultation services. Despite NobleFind's efforts to keep its online shop platform secure, the company faced persistent issues, including a recent data breach. These ongoing challenges disrupted normal operations and underscored the need for enhanced security measures. The designated IT team quickly responded to resolve the problem. To address these issues, NobleFind decided to implement an Information Security Management System (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 to improve security, protect customer data, and ensure the stability of its services.
In addition to its commitment to information security, NobleFind focuses on maintaining the accuracy and completeness of its product data. This is ensured by carefully managing version control, checking information regularly, enforcing strict access policies, and implementing backup procedures. Product details and customer designs are accessible only to authorized individuals with security measures such as multi-factor authentication and data access policies. NobleFind has implemented an incident investigation process within its ISMS and established record retention policies. NobleFind maintains and safeguards documented information, encompassing a wide range of data, records, and specifications—ensuring the security and integrity of customer data, historical records, and financial information.
As part of its commitment to information security, how does NobleFind ensure the integrity of its information? Refer to Scenario 1.
Scenario 8: SecureLynx is one Of the largest cybersecurity advisory and consulting companies that helps private sector organizations prevent security threats. improve security systems. and achieve business
SecureLynr is committed to complying with national and international standards to enhance the company'S resilience and credibility_ SecureLynx has Started implementing an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001
as part of its relentless pursuit of security.
As part of the internal audit activities. the top management reviewed and approved the audit objectives to assess the effectiveness of SecureLynx•s ISMS During the audit, the internal auditor evaluated whether
top management Supports activities associated with the ISMS and if the toles and responsibilities Of relevant parties are Clearly defined. This rigorous examination is a testament to SecureLynx'S
commitment to continuous improvernent and alignment of security measures with organizational goals.
SecureLynx employs an innovative dashboard that visually represents implemented processes and controls to ensure transparency and accountability within the Organization. This tool Offers stakeholders a real-
time overview of security measures. empowering them to make informed decisions and swiftly respond to emerging threats. As part of this initiative, Paula was appointed to a new position entrusted with the
responsibility Of collecting, recordlng, and Stoting data to measure the effectiveness Of the ISMS-
Furthermore, SecureLynx conducts management reviews every six months to ensure its Systems are robust and continually improving. These reviews serve as a crucial mechanism for assessing the efficacy Of
security measures and identifying areas for enhancement. SecureLynx's dedication to implementing and maintaining a robust ISMS exemplifies its commitment to innovation and Client satisfaction.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question.
Based on scenario 8, has SecureLynx appropriately conducted management reviews?
Scenario 4: TradeB. a commercial bank that has just entered the market, accepts deposits from its clients and offers basic financial services and loans for investments. TradeB has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 Having no experience of a management [^system implementation, TradeB's top management contracted two experts to direct and manage the ISMS implementation project.
First, the project team analyzed the 93 controls of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and their objectives Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on three nonnumerical categories (low, medium, and high). They evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria and decided to treat only the high risk category They also decided to focus primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures by establishing a new version of the access control policy, implementing controls to manage and control user access, and implementing a control for ICT readiness for business continuity
Lastly, they drafted a risk assessment report, in which they wrote that if after the implementation of these security controls the level of risk is below the acceptable level, the risks will be accepted
What should TradeB do in order to deal with residual risks? Refer to scenario 4.
An employee from Reyae Ltd. unintentionally sent an email containing critical business strategies to a competitor. Which information security principle was compromised in this case?
Which of the following steps is necessary to effectively implement information security controls?
Scenario 10: ProEBank
ProEBank is an Austrian financial institution known for its comprehensive range of banking services. Headquartered in Vienna, it leaverages the city's advanced technological and financial ecosystem To enhance its security posture, ProEBank has implementied an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001. After a year of having the ISMS in place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001.
To prepare for the audit, the company first informed its employees for the audit and organized training sessions to prepare them. It also prepared documented information in advance, so that the documents would be ready when external auditors asked to review them Additionally, it determined which of its employees have the knowledge to help the external auditors understand and evaluate the processes.
During the planning phase for the audit, ProEBank reviewed the list of assigned auditors provided by the certification body. Upon reviewing the list, ProEBank identified a potential conflict of interest with one of the auditors, who had previously worked for ProEBank's mein competitor in the banking industry To ensure the integrity of the audit process. ProEBank refused to undergo the audit until a completely new audit team was assigned. In response, the certification body acknowledged the conflict of interest and made the necessary adjustments to ensure the impartiality of the audit team
After the resolution of this issue, the audit team assessed whether the ISMS met both the standard's requirements and the company's objectives. During this process, the audit team focused on reviewing documented information.
Three weeks later, the team conducted an on-site visit to the auditee’s location where they aimed to evaluate whether the ISMS conformed to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. was effectively implemented, and enabled the auditee to reach its information security objectives. After the on-site visit the team prepared the audit conclusions and notified the auditee that some minor nonconformities had been detected The audit team leader then issued a recommendation for certification.
After receiving the recommendation from the audit team leader, the certification body established a committee to make the decision for certification. The committee included one member from the audit team and two other experts working for the certification body.
The certification body’s final decision for certification was made by a committee that included one auditor from the audit team and two other experts.
Question:
Is this acceptable?
What should an organization demonstrate through documentation?