Pass the Relativity Admin RCA Questions and answers with Dumpstech

The correct answer is D. Add them to an instance-level group with permissions to create groups, manage users, and assign permissions. Relativity’s instance security model allows administrators to assign instance-level permissions to groups through the Admin Security dialog. The documentation explains that permissions can be managed granularly through object security, tab visibility, and admin operations, which means a user can be given specific administrative rights without being made a full system administrator.

This matters because the System Administrators group grants broad access to admin-level permissions and tabs, including queue management. Relativity’s documentation specifically notes that system admins have access to all admin-level capabilities such as queue management, users, and groups tabs . If you do not want the user reviewing Processing or Production queues, giving full System Admin membership is broader than necessary. A workspace admin group is also insufficient for this requirement because creating groups, managing users, and assigning instance-level permissions are administrative functions controlled at the instance level. Therefore, the correct configuration is to place the user in an instance-level group with only the permissions they need.

The correct answer is C. Files must be generated using the RSMF specifications before they are imported into Relativity. Relativity’s official Short Message Format documentation explains that to use the Short Message Viewer, you first need to create an RSMF file, and the example/specification pages describe the required structure and header information that must be present before ingestion using Processing. Relativity also states that Processing is the recommended method of importing RSMF files into Relativity, which means the RSMF file already exists when Processing begins.

This rules out the other options. Relativity does not say that it automatically creates RSMF on-the-fly for all non-document data. It also does not describe a processing-profile feature that converts arbitrary XML from chat platforms into RSMF during import. Nor is there a document-list mass operation that converts conversations into RSMF. Instead, RSMF is a defined external format that must be constructed according to Relativity’s published specifications, then imported and processed to preserve message metadata, attachments, and near-native review behavior. Therefore, the correct answer is C.

The correct answer is C. Use Integration Points with the Links Only option for natives. Relativity’s repository workspace documentation explicitly says that to take advantage of reduced repository data costs, they strongly recommend promoting sets of documents via links only to standard review workspaces instead of storing duplicates of the files in the review workspace . The repository workflow page describes using Integration Points to move selected documents to the review workspace, and the billing guidance explains that if you promote actual files instead of links only, you incur both repository and review storage charges.

That makes option C the documented best practice. Uninstalling the repository application is actually listed as a condition that can affect repository billing adversely, so option A is incorrect. Exporting and re-importing with Import/Export duplicates the files and defeats the reduced-cost repository workflow. ARM restore is also not the recommended method for promoting data into active review while preserving the repository cost advantages. Therefore, the correct answer is use Integration Points with Links Only for natives .

The correct answer is C. The fields returned by the Searchable Set saved search are all empty for this document. Relativity documents that dtSearch indexes are built against a Searchable Set, and administrators must manually update those indexes when the underlying document search sets change. Relativity also describes dtSearch as indexing the content made available through the configured search/index setup rather than magically finding text that is not present in the indexed fields. If the document is part of the saved search but the fields being indexed for that document are empty, there is effectively no searchable text for dtSearch to return for that record.

Option B is not the best answer because an incremental build is a maintenance activity for adding new documents, not the documented reason a single already-known document cannot be found. Relativity notes that incremental builds look for new documents in the searchable set and do not re-index previously indexed records with changed content, which is a different issue. Option D is unrelated because Review Center queue assignment does not control whether a document is searchable through a dtSearch index. Option A is also not the best explanation for this question; dtSearch availability is driven by index/searchable-set configuration and accessible indexed text, not by parent-email folder access in the way the option suggests. So the best RCA-aligned answer is that the document has no indexed searchable content in the fields returned by the searchable set.