Pass the Fortinet Certified Professional Security Operations FCP_FAZ_AN-7.6 Questions and answers with Dumpstech

When using FortiAnalyzer to create playbooks that interact with FortiOS devices, anIncoming Webhooktrigger is required on the FortiGate side to make the actions in an automation stitch accessible through the FortiOS connector. The incoming webhook trigger allows FortiAnalyzer to initiate actions on FortiGate by sending HTTP POST requests to specified endpoints, which in turn trigger automation stitches defined on the FortiGate.

Here’s an analysis of each option:

Option A: FortiAnalyzer Event Handler

This is incorrect. The FortiAnalyzer Event Handler is used within FortiAnalyzer itself for handling log events and alerts, but it does not trigger automation stitches on FortiGate.

Option B: Fabric Connector event

This is incorrect. Fabric Connector events are related to Fortinet's Security Fabric integrations but are not specifically used to trigger FortiGate automation stitches from FortiAnalyzer.

Option C: FortiOS Event Log

This is incorrect. While FortiOS event logs can be used for monitoring, they are not designed to trigger automation stitches directly from FortiAnalyzer.

Option D: Incoming webhook

This is correct. The Incoming Webhook trigger on FortiGate enables it to receive requests fromFortiAnalyzer, allowing playbooks to activate automation stitches defined on the FortiGate device. This method is commonly used to integrate actions from FortiAnalyzer to FortiGate via the FortiOS connector.

In the exhibit, the data structure shows a checksum field and a data field with a long, seemingly encoded string. This format is indicative of a file that has been compressed or encoded for storage and transfer.

Export Data Type:

The data field is likely a base64-encoded string, which is commonly used to represent binary data in text format. Base64 encoding is often applied to data that has been compressed (zipped) for easier handling and transfer. The checksum field, with an MD5 hash, provides a way to verify the integrity of the data after decompression.

Option Analysis:

A. The export data type is zipped: Correct. The compressed and encoded format of the data suggests that the export is in a zipped format, allowing for efficient storage and transfer.

B. The playbook is misconfigured: There is no indication of misconfiguration in this exhibit. The presence of the checksum and data fields aligns with standard export practices.

C. The option to include the connector was not selected: There is no evidence in the output to conclude that connectors are missing. Connectors are typically listed separately and would not directly affect the checksum and encoded data structure.

D. Your colleague put a password on the export: There’s no indication of password protection in the exhibit. Password protection would likely alter the data structure, and there would be some mention of encryption.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:A. The export data type is zipped.

This answer is consistent with the typical use of base64 encoding for compressed (zipped) data exports in FortiAnalyzer.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of knowledge of FortiAnalyzer 7.6 Study guide documents:

The study guide explains that FortiAnalyzer playbook tasks rely on connectors, and that the FortiOS connector will not show its available actions until FortiGate is configured with the correct automation trigger. The guide states:“For example, the FortiOS connector will be listed as soon as the first FortiGate device is added to FortiAnalyzer. However, to see the actions related to that FortiOS connector, you must enable an automation rule using the Incoming Webhook Call trigger on FortiGate.”

This is why the required FortiGate trigger type isIncoming webhook(option B): it is the specific trigger FortiOS must use so FortiAnalyzer can expose and use the FortiOS connector actions within the playbook workflow.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of knowledge of FortiAnalyzer 7.6 Study guide documents:

The study guide explicitly describes what content fromFabric membersis visible/usable on theFabric supervisor:

Logs:“In the FortiAnalyzer Fabric supervisor,Log View displays logs collected on all FortiAnalyzer Fabric members.”

Reports:“For reports, the FortiAnalyzer Fabric supervisorcan fetch and aggregate data from multiple membersin the FortiAnalyzer Fabric.”

Events:“Events generated by event handlers on the FortiAnalyzer Fabric members are visible on the supervisor.”

By contrast, the study guide lists a key limitation that rules outPlaybooksas a supervisor capability over members: “You are not able to perform configuration changes or torun automation playbooks from the Fabric supervisor to members.”

Therefore, the three modules available for analysis on the supervisor areLogs, Events, and Reports(C, D, E).

The objective is to create a filter that identifies all login attempts to the FortiAnalyzer web interface (GUI) coming fromLaptop1(IP 10.1.1.100) and excludes the admin user. This filter should match any user other than admin.

Filter Components Analysis:

Operation-login: This portion of the filter will target login actions specifically, which is correct for filtering login attempts.

performed_on==’’GUI(10.1.1.100)’: This indicates that the login attempt must occur on the GUI interface and originate from the specified IP, which matches Laptop1's IP address (10.1.1.100). This ensures that the filter only matches GUI logins from this specific device.

user!=admin: This part excludes logins by the admin user, meeting the requirement to capture only non-admin users.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correctly specifies theOperation-login,performed_on==’’GUI(10.1.1.100)’, anduser!=admin. This setup effectively filters login attempts to the GUI from Laptop1, excluding the admin user.

Option B: Uses the incorrect IP 10.1.1.120 in the performed_on filter, which does not match Laptop1's IP (10.1.1.100).

Option C: This option includessrcip==10.1.1.100anddstip==10.1.1.210but incorrectly specifiesuser==admininstead ofuser!=admin, which does not match the requirement to exclude admin users.

Option D: This option does not specify theperformed_onfield to restrict it to the GUI and only includesdstip(destination IP) withoutsrcip. It also incorrectly uses user!-admin instead of the correct syntaxuser!=admin.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:A. Operation-login and performed_on==’’GUI(10.1.1.100)’ and user!=admin

This filter precisely captures the required conditions: login attempts from Laptop1 to the GUI interface by any user except admin.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of knowledge of FortiAnalyzer 7.6 Study guide documents:

FortiAnalyzer supports moving reporting content across ADOMs by importing/exporting reporting objects, but it enforces ADOM compatibility. The study guide states: “You can, however,import and export reports and charts… into different ADOMs …” and explicitly requires that “Both ADOMs must be of the same type.” This directly validates statementA.

For report dependencies, the study guide clarifies how datasets are handled during transfer. While “You can’t export templates and datasets,” it also explains that when you export a chart, “the associated dataset is exported with it, so when you import an exported chart,the associated dataset is imported as well.” Since reports are composed of charts (and charts depend on datasets), moving a report between ADOMs entails moving its charts; when those charts are exported/imported, their datasets come with them. This supports statementCbased on the documented chart→dataset import/export behavior.

StatementDis not required because the study guide explicitly indicates you can “export and import reports” directly, and additionally notes that on import “you can save the layout of the report as a template” (optional, not a prerequisite).