Pass the PRINCE2 Certification PRINCE2-7-Practitioner Questions and answers with Dumpstech

The correct answer is B — Project executive . Selecting the project approach is an activity within the starting up a project process. The approach establishes the overall way in which the project’s products will be created and delivered, including considerations such as delivery method, sourcing, specialist techniques, and relevant organizational or commercial constraints.

The project manager performs substantial analysis and coordination in developing the proposed approach, drawing on specialist advice where required. However, the question specifically asks which role is accountable . Accountability rests with the project executive , who is ultimately accountable for the project’s success and for ensuring that the chosen approach is compatible with the business justification, organizational environment, and project mandate.

Option C is attractive because the project manager has operational responsibility for preparing and developing many elements of the project approach. However, responsibility for performing an activity and accountability for ensuring its appropriate outcome are distinct concepts. Option D is also too narrow: the senior supplier provides important specialist expertise concerning feasibility and delivery, but represents the supplier interest rather than holding overall accountability. Option A establishes the wider organizational direction but does not own this project-level decision.

The executive therefore remains accountable while drawing on the project manager and specialist supplier expertise to establish a viable approach.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Starting up a project; select the project approach; project executive accountability; project manager responsibility; supplier expertise.

===============

The correct answer is A . The purpose of the business case is to provide the information needed to determine whether the project represents a desirable, viable, and achievable investment. Developing that justification requires the project to evaluate credible alternatives rather than assuming that the initially proposed solution is automatically the optimum investment.

The option without the underground car park is described as credible. It is therefore appropriate for the project manager to include an investment appraisal of that option so that decision-makers can compare its costs, benefits, risks, dis-benefits, and overall value with those of the preferred solution. The main contractor’s objection does not remove the project’s responsibility to examine legitimate business alternatives; supplier preferences must not determine investment justification.

Option B is incorrect because PRINCE2 does not impose a universal requirement for customer and supplier organizations to maintain completely separate business cases. Option C incorrectly treats initial scope as immutable. During development of the business case, alternative configurations can be evaluated when this helps determine the most appropriate investment. Option D similarly assumes that one anticipated benefit—parking income—precludes examination of other options. A benefit is an input to investment appraisal, not a reason to suppress alternatives.

The scenario therefore demonstrates objective option appraisal as part of sound business justification.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Business case practice; business options; investment appraisal; justification; desirability, viability and achievability; initiating a project.

===============

The correct answer is A . The learn from experience principle requires learning to occur throughout the project lifecycle, not merely during initiation or closure. Lessons should be sought, recorded where appropriate, communicated to those who can use them, and incorporated into current or future decisions and ways of working.

The fortnightly cross-team session directly addresses the project manager’s concern that lessons emerging in one work package may otherwise remain isolated. Sharing them across teams allows corrective knowledge to be applied while it can still prevent rework, delay, cost escalation, or repeated mistakes. Official PeopleCert material emphasizes that lessons should be considered before starting, captured during delivery, and actively applied; simply recording a lesson without changing future behavior does not constitute effective learning.

Option B describes another legitimate source of lessons—previous projects—but does not explain the specific benefit demonstrated in the scenario, which concerns lessons arising across teams during the current stage . Option C contradicts PRINCE2’s expectation that lessons improve project performance rather than being regarded as non-productive overhead. Option D incorrectly postpones learning until the end of the stage, when the opportunity to prevent immediate repetition may already have passed.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Learn from experience; lessons log; knowledge sharing; applying lessons throughout the project lifecycle.

===============

The correct answer is B . The principle define roles, responsibilities and relationships requires more than assigning job titles. Individuals need to understand their delegated responsibilities, their authority, their interfaces with other participants, and what they can reasonably expect from those relationships.

The Heritage Director may delegate assurance activity provided accountability and authority remain appropriately structured. In this scenario, the Heritage Manager is expected to coordinate with the BuildyBrick CEO and project manager and report on whether the proposed inspection arrangements provide adequate assurance. For this arrangement to work, the Heritage Manager must understand precisely what the Heritage Director expects, the scope of the delegated review, and the contributions expected from the other parties.

PRINCE2 7 explicitly strengthens its treatment of relationships and recognizes that project effectiveness depends on deliberate interaction between people rather than merely documenting roles. PeopleCert describes clear responsibilities and good relationships as important foundations for governance, assurance, collaboration, and successful change.

Option A is too absolute: the principle does not impose an unrestricted requirement for every communication channel to remain open to everyone at all times. Options C and D incorrectly assume the activity cannot be delegated. PRINCE2 permits delegation while retaining appropriate accountability.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Define roles, responsibilities and relationships; Organization practice; delegation; assurance; project relationships.

===============

The correct mapping is Action 1 — A; Action 2 — E; Action 3 — C .

For Action 1 , the appointment of an additional contractor exceeds the project manager’s delegated authority. Although both options remain within overall stage cost and time tolerances, the project manager cannot authorize a decision that falls outside their defined authority. The matter must therefore be referred to the appropriate project-board authority, with the project executive responsible for leading the decision.

For Action 2 , maintaining project records is part of the project manager’s day-to-day management responsibility. Once a decision has been taken, the project manager should ensure that the issue record is updated with the authorized response and decision so that there is an accurate audit trail.

For Action 3 , the senior supplier represents those providing specialist resources and expertise to create the project’s products. Confirming that appropriate supplier resources can be made available for additional site-clearance work consequently aligns with the supplier interest.

This question illustrates that issue management must operate within the project’s governance and delegation arrangements. Remaining within tolerance does not automatically permit the project manager to take an action specifically outside their delegated authority.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Issues practice; delegated authority; issue report; issue register; project executive; project manager; senior supplier.

===============

The correct answer is B . During evaluate a work package , the team manager periodically assesses actual and forecast performance against the authorized work package and, where applicable, the team plan. This requires consideration of relevant product, quality, risk, issue, lesson, and progress information so that the current status and forecast completion can be determined accurately.

Here, the missing electrical cabling has caused the security-system installation to be forecast one week late and beyond the delegated work-package time tolerance. Because management by exception operates through delegated tolerances, the team manager cannot simply absorb a forecast breach that lies outside the authority provided by the project manager. The project manager must therefore be informed.

The checkpoint report is the normal mechanism by which the team manager reports work-package progress to the project manager. However, a forecast tolerance breach should also be brought promptly to the project manager’s attention rather than waiting passively for routine reporting.

Option A identifies only one aspect of evaluation and fails to address the forecast tolerance breach. Option C incorrectly removes evaluation responsibility from the team manager. Option D bypasses the management hierarchy: a team manager escalates work-package exceptions to the project manager , not directly to the project board.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Managing product delivery; evaluate a work package; checkpoint reports; work-package tolerances; management by exception; escalation.

===============