Pass the Salesforce Developer JavaScript-Developer-I Questions and answers with Dumpstech

Two key browser events:

DOMContentLoaded (fired on document): Fired when the HTML document has been completely loaded and parsed, without waiting for stylesheets, images, and subresources to finish loading.

load (fired on window): Fired when the entire page is fully loaded, including all dependent resources such as stylesheets and images.

The requirement states:

“… when the webpage is fully loaded with HTML content and all related files.”

That matches the semantics of the load event on the window object.

So the correct code is:

window.addEventListener( ' load ' , personalizeWebsiteContent);

Why others are incorrect:

A: DOMContentLoaded fires earlier, when HTML is parsed, but before all related files (images, some styles, etc.) are guaranteed to be loaded.

B: ' onDOMContentLoaded ' is not a valid event name; the event is ' DOMContentLoaded ' .

D: When using addEventListener, the event type is ' load ' , not ' onload ' . ' onload ' is the name of the handler property (window.onload = ...), not the event string.

Relevant concepts: window.load event, DOMContentLoaded, addEventListener syntax, page load lifecycle.

We need to track the value of counter and the timing of each call to logCounter.

Initial state:

Line 01: counter = 0;

Line 02–04: logCounter logs the current value of counter.

Execution order and timing:

Line 05: logCounter();

Called immediately at time t = 0 ms.

counter is 0.

First log: 0.

Line 06: setTimeout(logCounter, 2100);

Schedules logCounter to run once after 2100 ms.

No log yet at this line.

Line 07–10: setInterval(() = > { counter++; logCounter(); }, 1000);

Schedules a repeating callback every 1000 ms (1 second).

First interval callback runs at t ≈ 1000 ms.

Now follow the timeline:

t = 0 ms:

logCounter(); from line 05

Logs: 0

t = 1000 ms (first interval execution):

counter++; → counter goes from 0 to 1.

logCounter(); logs 1.

t = 2000 ms (second interval execution):

counter++; → counter goes from 1 to 2.

logCounter(); logs 2.

t = 2100 ms (timeout from line 06):

logCounter(); runs again.

counter is still 2 (next setInterval will be at t = 3000 ms).

Logs 2.

So the first four logs are:

0

1

2

2

Concatenated as in the options: 0122.

Therefore, the correct choice is:

Answer: A

Study Guide / Concept References (no links):

setTimeout and setInterval timing behavior

Order of execution in the event loop

Closures capturing variables (here, logCounter using counter)

Understanding asynchronous scheduling in JavaScript

JavaScript consoles (browsers and Node) provide timing utilities:

console.time(label) – starts a timer with the given label.

console.timeEnd(label) – stops the timer and logs the total elapsed time.

console.timeLog(label) – logs the current elapsed time without stopping the timer.

To measure the time taken by each function separately while still using a single overall timer, you can log intermediate times:

console.time( ' Performance ' );

maybeAHeavyFunction();

console.timeLog( ' Performance ' , ' after maybeAHeavyFunction ' );

thisCouldTakeTooLong();

console.timeLog( ' Performance ' , ' after thisCouldTakeTooLong ' );

orMaybeThisOne();

console.timeLog( ' Performance ' , ' after orMaybeThisOne ' );

console.timeEnd( ' Performance ' );

Each console.timeLog( ' Performance ' ) call prints the elapsed time since console.time( ' Performance ' ) was started, so you can infer how long each function took.

Note: console.endTime in the original snippet is incorrect; the real method is console.timeEnd.

Why other options are incorrect:

B. console.trace()

Prints a stack trace, not timing information.

C. console.timeStamp()

Used with browser performance tools; it does not directly show elapsed times like timeLog or timeEnd.

D. console.getTime()

Not a standard console method.

Thus, the function that can be used to obtain timing between calls is:

Answer: A

Study Guide Concepts:

console.time, console.timeLog, console.timeEnd

Measuring performance and intermediate timings

Standard console debugging API methods

The correct answer is C .

The typing errors in the options should be corrected as follows:

event.stopPropagation();

The stopPropagation() method is used to stop an event from continuing through the DOM event propagation path.

A click event normally goes through these phases:

Capturing phase → Target phase → Bubbling phase

Because the event listener is attached to the button:

el.addEventListener( " click " , printMessage, false);

the function printMessage receives the click event when the button is clicked. To stop the event from bubbling up to parent elements, the event object should be accepted as a parameter and stopPropagation() should be called inside the event handler.

Corrected code:

< html >

< body >

< div id= " logo " > Hello Logo! < /div >

< button id= " test " > Click me < /button >

< /body >

< script >

function printMessage(event) {

event.stopPropagation();

console.log( ' This is a test message ' );

}

let el = document.getElementById( ' test ' );

el.addEventListener( " click " , printMessage, false);

< /script >

< /html >

Why this is correct:

event.stopPropagation();

prevents the click event from moving upward to ancestor elements after the button’s handler runs.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A and B are incorrect because removeEventListener() is used to remove a previously registered event listener. It does not stop event bubbling for the current event.

D is incorrect because stopPropagation() should be called inside the active event handler that receives the event object. In this case, that function is:

printMessage(event)

Therefore, the verified answer is C .

The correct answer is D .

When a module contains multiple functions and each function should be available individually, the best choice is a named export .

Example:

function add(a, b) {

return a + b;

}

function subtract(a, b) {

return a - b;

}

export { add, subtract };

Then another file can import exactly the functions it needs:

import { add, subtract } from ' ./mathUtils.js ' ;

console.log(add(5, 2));

console.log(subtract(5, 2));

Named exports are useful when a module provides several reusable functions, constants, or classes.

Why the other options are incorrect:

multi is not a JavaScript export type.

default is usually used when a module has one main value to export. A module can only have one default export.

all is not an export type in JavaScript module syntax.

Therefore, the correct export type for multiple functions is named export , so the verified answer is D .

Object.preventExtensions(obj) This built-in JavaScript method marks an object so that no new properties can be added to it. Existing properties can still be read and updated, but adding new ones is disallowed.

const newObjBook = objBook; Both variables reference the same object in memory. JavaScript objects are assigned by reference, not copied.

newObjBook.author = " Robert " ; Because the object has been marked as non-extensible, JavaScript will not allow new properties to be added. The behavior depends on mode:

In non-strict mode: the assignment silently fails and does nothing.

In strict mode: this would throw a TypeError.

Since nothing indicates strict mode, this is non-strict behavior, making the assignment fail silently.

Therefore, the object remains:

{ title: " JavaScript " }

Both objBook and newObjBook point to the same unchanged object.

This matches option A.

JavaScript knowledge references (text-only)

Object.preventExtensions() prevents adding new properties.

Assigning an object to another variable copies the reference, not the object.

Adding a property to a non-extensible object silently fails in non-strict mode.

==================================================

The correct answer is C .

The original option contains a typing error. It should use the existing variable name:

let numberValue = Number(strNumber);

The value of strNumber is a string:

' 12345 '

Using Number() converts the numeric string into a JavaScript number:

12345

So after execution:

typeof numberValue;

returns:

" number "

Professional review of each option:

Option

Result

Explanation

A

Incorrect

JavaScript does not have a standard global Integer() conversion function.

B

Incorrect

Strings do not have a standard .toInteger() method.

C

Correct

Number(strNumber) correctly converts ' 12345 ' into 12345.

D

Incorrect

This is not valid JavaScript casting syntax.

A commonly used alternative would also be:

let numberValue = parseInt(strNumber, 10);

But from the provided answer choices, the verified answer is C .

The correct answers are A, B, and D .

The two variables are:

let str1 = ' Java ' ;

let str2 = ' Script ' ;

The goal is to combine them into:

JavaScript

Option A is correct because template literals can insert variables directly into a string:

`${str1}${str2}`

This becomes:

`${ ' Java ' }${ ' Script ' }`

Result:

JavaScript

Option B is correct because strings have a concat() method:

str1.concat(str2);

This joins str2 onto the end of str1.

Result:

JavaScript

Option D is correct because the + operator performs string concatenation when both operands are strings:

str1 + str2;

This becomes:

' Java ' + ' Script '

Result:

JavaScript

The incorrect options:

Option C is not valid JavaScript for joining strings. const is used for declaring constants, not concatenating values.

Option E is incorrect because join() is an array method, not a string method. This would only work with an array, for example:

[ ' Java ' , ' Script ' ].join( ' ' );

But str1 is a string, so:

str1.join(str2)

is invalid.

Therefore, the verified answers are A, B, and D .

The key line is:

for (let something of obj) {

In JavaScript:

for...of is used to iterate over iterable objects, such as:

Arrays

Strings

Maps

Sets

Other objects that implement a [Symbol.iterator] method.

Plain JavaScript objects created with object literal {} are not iterable by default . They do not have [Symbol.iterator], so using for...of directly on them causes a runtime error.

Specifically:

for (let something of obj) { ... }

will throw a TypeError similar to:

obj is not iterable

Therefore, the loop body never executes, and console.log(output); is never reached without an error.

Why other options are incorrect:

B. [1, 2]

To get [1, 2], you could use Object.values(obj) and iterate that array.

But here, for...of obj never yields values because it throws an error.

C. [ " foo " , " bar " ]

To get property names, you could use Object.keys(obj) with for...of.

Again, the code does not do that; it incorrectly tries to iterate the object directly.

D. [ " foo:1 " , " bar:2 " ]

You would need both keys and values, combining them manually.

The given code does not implement such logic and fails before pushing anything into output.

Hence, the correct answer is:

Answer: A

Study Guide / Concept References (no links):

Difference between for...of and for...in

Iterables in JavaScript and [Symbol.iterator]

Plain objects {} are not iterable by default

Correct patterns to iterate object keys/values (Object.keys, Object.values, Object.entries)

JavaScript defines two main page-loading events:

DOMContentLoaded Fires when the HTML document has been completely parsed. External resources like images, stylesheets, iframe contents, etc. may not be loaded yet .

load event on window Fires when:

HTML is fully parsed

All dependent resources (images, scripts, CSS, fonts, etc.) are fully loaded

The requirement states:

“when the webpage is fully loaded (HTML content and all related files )”

This aligns exactly with the window load event .

Implementation:

window.addEventListener( " load " , personalizeWebsiteContent);

This matches option B.

JavaScript knowledge references (text-only)

DOMContentLoaded fires after HTML parsing only.

load fires after all page resources finish loading.

The window object is the correct target for listening to the full load event.