Pass the SAVE International Value Methodology CVS Questions and answers with Dumpstech

The correct answers are C and D . The end-of-workshop presentation is part of the Presentation Phase , whose objective is to obtain concurrence and commitment from the designer, project sponsor, and management to proceed with implementation. SAVE’s VM Job Plan identifies Presentation Phase activities as presenting an oral report, preparing the written report, and obtaining implementation commitments. ( UW Courses )

Therefore, the level of management involvement directly affects scheduling because the presentation must be arranged when the decision-making body, sponsor, designer, and appropriate managers are available. The standard states that the VM team presents recommendations to the decision-making body and uses interactive discussion to obtain approval or direction for more information. ( UW Courses )

The number of VM proposals developed also affects scheduling because more proposals require more time for explanation, supporting data, benefit analysis, cost/schedule impacts, risks, and implementation requirements. The Development Phase requires each proposed alternative to include technical data, cost and performance data, schedule impact, and implementation planning before presentation. ( UW Courses )

Team size and general participant count may affect logistics, but they are not the primary scheduling drivers for the formal final presentation.

References/topics: Presentation Phase; Development Phase; VM Proposals; Management Commitment; Implementation Planning.

The correct answer is C. quantitative or qualitative . In Value Methodology, a function is expressed in a concise two-word structure: active verb + measurable noun . The noun identifies the object or outcome acted upon by the verb and should permit measurement wherever possible. SAVE’s VM glossary defines a function as what a project, product, or process must do to meet customer needs and states that it is expressed using an active verb and measurable noun structure.

The noun may be quantitative when it supports a work or use function, such as “support weight,” “transmit current,” or “reduce cost.” These nouns can be measured directly through units such as pounds, amperes, dollars, time, or capacity. The noun may also be qualitative when the function reflects sell, aesthetic, or esteem-related value, such as improving appearance, enhancing comfort, or satisfying users. SAVE’s glossary distinguishes sell functions as usually qualitative, while work functions are usually quantitative.

Therefore, “quantitative or qualitative” is the only option that aligns with VM function definition rules.

References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Function Definition; Work Functions; Sell Functions; Verb-Noun Function Format.

I can’t select answers for a live timed certification exam.

For study/review, use this logic for the VM Job Plan :

The VM Job Plan is the structured sequence used to conduct a Value Methodology study. It normally includes the major phases such as Preparation, Information, Function Analysis, Creativity, Evaluation, Development, Presentation, and Implementation . A correct statement about the Job Plan should describe the full structured process, not just early planning.

Also, VM is not limited to financial savings. It balances function, quality, performance, cost, risk, and stakeholder value . So any option saying VM focuses mainly on financial benefit over quality/functionality is usually incorrect.

Implementation is the phase where approved VM results are carried into action. Therefore, statements about integrating study results through implementation align with the Job Plan concept.

Main topic: Value Methodology and Job Plan .

The correct answer is A. Groupthink . In VM facilitation, a team can appear active, cooperative, and verbally engaged while still failing to make meaningful progress if members are converging too quickly, avoiding disagreement, or reinforcing the same assumptions. This is characteristic of groupthink , where apparent harmony masks weak analysis and limited challenge to alternatives. Groupthink is defined as a negative group decision process involving conformity pressure, self-censorship, and reduced critical examination in cohesive groups.

This aligns directly with VM team-dynamics responsibilities. The SAVE International Study Guide states that the Job Plan supports team synergy within a structured process , not merely a collection of individual opinions. ( ) The team leader must keep the team focused, keep members involved in discussion and work, and act as a catalyst to keep the team moving and motivated. ( )

Option B would more likely produce visible discomfort or withdrawal. Option C, social loafing, reflects reduced individual effort, not an engaged but stalled team. Option D may influence participation, but it is not the best diagnostic cause here. The facilitation response should restore inquiry, challenge assumptions, and encourage constructive dissent.

References/topics: VM Facilitation and Team Dynamics; Team Leader Responsibilities; Job Plan Discipline; Groupthink; Team Progress Barriers.

The correct answer is D. demonstrate that the VM team understood objectives of the VM study . At an Implementation Meeting, the decision-makers are not primarily looking for a training session on Value Methodology or a review of the VM Job Plan. They need confidence that the VM study results are grounded in the actual project objectives, constraints, required functions, and success criteria.

A five-minute presentation must be concise and decision-focused. The facilitator should quickly show that the VM team understood the study scope, owner goals, performance needs, cost drivers, risks, and implementation expectations. This builds credibility before decision-makers review the disposition of VM proposals.

Option A is incorrect because the Job Plan explains the process, but implementation decision-makers need results and alignment, not a phase-by-phase lecture. Option B is also too broad for a five-minute implementation presentation. Option C is inappropriate because the meeting is not about individual team-member recognition. The strongest presentation is one that links the VM recommendations back to the study objectives and shows that the team’s proposals support those objectives.

References/topics: Implementation Phase; Implementation Meeting; VM Proposal Disposition; Study Objectives; Decision-Maker Confidence.

The correct answers are A and D . When a VM study team struggles to complete a FAST diagram, the facilitator should guide the team through questioning, not take control of the technical work. Asking whether a function is missing is an appropriate facilitation technique because a break in the How/Why logic often means the team has skipped a needed function, used an unclear verb-noun statement, or failed to connect a supporting function to a higher-order function. This keeps ownership with the team while helping them complete the logic chain.

Reviewing the level of abstraction is also correct. FAST diagramming requires functions to be placed at the right level: not too broad, not too detailed, and consistent with the project scope. If one function is stated at a strategic level and another at a component-detail level, the FAST diagram becomes difficult to organize.

Option B is incorrect because the facilitator should not reorganize the functions for the team; that weakens team participation and ownership. Option C is incorrect because not every identified function must appear in the final FAST diagram. Only functions that support the logical function model should be used.

References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; FAST Diagramming; Facilitation; Function Logic; Level of Abstraction.

The correct answers are A and C because the VM Job Plan is a sequential, function-based process. SAVE’s study guide explains that the Job Plan guides the study team through identifying and focusing on key project functions so new ideas can be created for value improvement. It also states that Job Plan phases are performed in sequence because each phase provides the information needed for the next phase. ( )

Therefore, functions must be defined before alternative solutions are generated . This occurs in the Function Analysis Phase , where the team identifies, classifies, and models project functions, then selects value-mismatched functions to focus the Creativity Phase. ( ) The Creative Phase then generates alternative ideas for performing those functions, while the Evaluation Phase later reduces and prioritizes those ideas by considering cost, performance, and other evaluation methods. ( )

Option B is incorrect because idea generation and evaluation are intentionally separated; judgment is suspended during Creativity and applied during Evaluation. Option D is incorrect because functions are not fully defined before the VM study; they are formally developed during the Job Plan.

References/topics: VM Job Plan; Function Analysis Phase; Creativity Phase; Evaluation Phase; Sequential Job Plan Logic.

The correct answer is Customer FAST . In Value Methodology, FAST is used in the Function Analysis Phase to model how functions relate to each other and to clarify what the project must accomplish from a functional perspective. The customer-oriented version of FAST is specifically designed to reflect that the customer determines value in the function analysis process. The SAVE study guide describes the Customer-Oriented FAST model as a variation that adds customer-focused support functions such as “attract users,” “satisfy users,” “assure dependability,” and “assure convenience.” ( )

This makes Customer FAST the best tool when the study team wants to show customer satisfaction as part of the value logic. Quality Function Deployment can capture or translate the voice of the customer, but the question asks for a tool to show customer satisfaction within the VM function structure. A quality management plan is a project quality control document, not a VM function model. A resource model addresses inputs or resource use rather than customer-perceived value. Therefore, Customer FAST is the most technically precise answer.

References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; FAST Diagramming; Customer-Oriented FAST; Customer Attitude; Function Modeling.

The correct answer is C. Higher order and basic functions . In FAST diagramming, the project scope is shown by vertical scope lines that define the portion of the function logic included in the value study. The left project scope line separates the broader reason for the study from the functions that are actually inside the study boundary.

The higher order function is placed outside the left scope line because it answers the “why” question for the basic function. It represents the larger objective or purpose that the basic function supports. FAST guidance states that highest-order functions appear outside the left scope line and to the left of the basic functions. ( )

The basic function is placed immediately to the right of the left scope line. It represents the primary purpose or mission of the subject under study. The FAST reference specifically states that basic functions immediately to the right of the left scope line represent the purpose or mission of the subject. ( )

Therefore, the left project scope line is located between the higher order function and the basic function .

References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; FAST Diagramming; Project Scope Line; Higher Order Function; Basic Function; How/Why Logic.

The correct answers are B and D . The Evaluation Phase requires the VM team to apply a structured evaluation process so that ideas are judged against defined requirements rather than informal preference. SAVE’s Value Methodology Standard states that the team selects ideas with potential for value improvement while still delivering the required functions and considering performance requirements and resource limits. ( )

Therefore, setting baseline criteria is essential because impact cannot be measured unless the current or expected performance condition is defined first. Baselines allow future outcomes to be compared against the starting point and help determine whether the selected alternative actually improves value. Defining key performance indicators is also correct because KPIs translate subject objectives into measurable evaluation factors, such as time, quality, productivity, service level, risk reduction, cost effectiveness, or functional performance.

Option A is weak because a one-time opinion survey may provide useful input, but it does not create a disciplined impact-measurement framework. Option C is too narrow because budget review only addresses financial efficiency and does not fully evaluate subject impact. The official SAVE Core Competencies also place “establish evaluation framework” and “establish evaluation criteria” directly within the Evaluation Phase.

References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Evaluation Framework; Evaluation Criteria; KPI Alignment; Baseline Measurement; Subject Impact Analysis.

The correct answers are B and C . When a VM study team has little or no experience with function analysis, the facilitator should introduce the concept through simple demonstration and participative learning. SAVE guidance identifies Function Analysis as the foundation of Value Methodology and explains that functions are expressed in two-word active verb / measurable noun form to describe what work is being performed. ( ) Showing an example of function analysis helps the team see how physical items are translated into functional language before applying the method to the study subject.

Having the team identify functions of items in the room is also effective because it creates a low-risk practice exercise. The SAVE study material provides simple item-based examples such as a table performing “Support Weight” and a screwdriver performing “Transmit Torque,” which directly supports this teaching approach. ( ) This builds confidence before moving to more complex project functions.

Option A is not preferred because preparing the FAST diagram in advance removes team discovery, ownership, and consensus-building. Option D is incorrect because functions must first be identified before they can be classified, analyzed, or evaluated; function analysis is defined as the process of defining, classifying, and evaluating functions. ( )

References/topics: VM Facilitation; Team Learning; Function Analysis Phase; Function Identification; FAST Introduction.