Pass the SAVE International Value Methodology CVS Questions and answers with Dumpstech

The correct answer is C . During the Creativity Phase , the VM facilitator encourages unrestricted idea generation, but the study must still remain aligned with the approved scope, objectives, and sponsor expectations. If the team begins identifying alternatives that appear outside the agreed study boundary, the facilitator should not simply shut down the ideas or allow the team to vote on changing the scope. Scope authority belongs to the study sponsor or client decision structure, not only to the workshop team.

The best action is to discuss and confirm the study scope with the VM Team and study sponsor . This protects both creativity and control. The facilitator can clarify whether the ideas are truly outside scope, whether they should be parked for later consideration, or whether the sponsor wishes to formally expand or adjust the study boundary. This is consistent with VM facilitation practice, where the facilitator manages process discipline while maintaining team participation and sponsor alignment.

Option A is incorrect because scope changes are not decided by team vote. Option B addresses schedule, not scope. Option D is too restrictive and may suppress creative thinking.

References/topics: Creativity Phase; VM Facilitation; Study Scope Control; Sponsor Alignment; VM Job Plan Discipline.

The correct answers are C and D . A useful Work Breakdown Structure converts project or study information into a structured breakdown of the total scope. In VM program planning, this supports clearer control of deliverables, responsibilities, schedule logic, and implementation follow-up. The WBS is not simply a chronological activity list; it is a structured decomposition of the work into defined, manageable elements. This aligns with standard project-management guidance that describes the WBS as a hierarchical breakdown of project work into smaller components or work packages. ( Atlassian )

Option C is correct because identifying major milestones or high-level outputs and then decomposing them into manageable elements is a practical way to convert broad study information into usable work packages. Option D is also correct because breaking the project into defined elements is the core purpose of the WBS.

Option A is incorrect because chronological sequencing belongs more to scheduling, not WBS construction. Option B is incorrect because cost estimating may use the WBS later, but the WBS itself should be organized around scope, deliverables, and work elements rather than cost first. PMI also treats the WBS as a foundational project-control structure. ( Project Management Institute )

References/topics: VM Programs; Work Breakdown Structure; Implementation Planning; Project Scope Decomposition; Deliverable Control.

The correct answers are A and B . During the Development Phase , the VM team is converting selected ideas into value alternatives, so any new information that affects assumptions, cost, risk, performance, stakeholder impact, or feasibility must be evaluated before the proposal is finalized. SAVE’s Study Guide explains that each Job Plan phase provides information needed for the next phase and that, as the team gains additional knowledge, a previous phase may be revisited. ( ) Therefore, the facilitator should first assess the information with the VM team to determine whether it changes the rationale, calculations, risk profile, or viability of any proposal.

The facilitator should also discuss the information with the study subject program manager because the information may affect scope, owner requirements, baseline assumptions, implementation constraints, or management expectations. In the Development Phase, value alternatives must be clearly written with supporting assumptions, calculations, vendor information, cost comparisons, and other information needed to convey the alternative. ( )

Option C is premature because new information does not automatically require a new proposal. Option D is incorrect because disregarding relevant information undermines proposal credibility and informed decision-making.

References/topics: Development Phase; Value Alternative Development; Facilitator Responsibilities; Proposal Validation; VM Team Coordination.

The correct answer is B . SAVE’s dictionary defines a facilitator as someone who is substantively neutral, has no substantive decision-making authority, and helps a group improve how it identifies and solves problems, makes decisions, and increases effectiveness. In the VM context, the facilitator leads the group through the VM Job Plan and is associated with the Value Team Leader role.

Option A is wrong because a facilitator who pushes a preferred solution compromises neutrality and suppresses team ownership. Option C is too narrow; cost estimating may support the study, but the facilitator’s role is process leadership, not simply estimating. Option D is unrealistic and incorrect. Disagreement can be productive when managed professionally. The facilitator should structure the discussion, clarify assumptions, surface competing stakeholder needs, and guide the team toward function-based consensus. CVS facilitation requires discipline: the facilitator protects the process, manages participation, maintains phase boundaries, and prevents premature judgment while ensuring the team produces usable outputs.

References/topics: VM Facilitation; Team Dynamics; Facilitator Neutrality.

The correct answers are C and D . The Presentation Phase is where the VM facilitator and study team formally communicate the conclusions of the VM study to decision makers. SAVE’s VM Standard Reference states that, in this phase, the facilitator develops a report and/or presentation that documents and conveys the conclusions and results of the VM study.

Therefore, the VM study report is a direct output of the Presentation Phase. It records the developed value alternatives, supporting analysis, cost/performance implications, and the basis for management review. The list of VM proposals and results is also an output because decision makers must understand what proposals were generated, what benefits they offer, and what outcomes or decisions are associated with them.

Option A, list of participants, may appear in a report appendix or study record, but it is not a primary Presentation Phase output. Option B is incorrect because scheduling the VM presentation is a planning/logistics activity, not an output of the phase. The phase produces documented results and communicates VM proposals for decision and follow-up.

References/topics: Presentation Phase; VM Study Report; VM Proposals; Study Results; VM Job Plan.