Pass the CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply L4M3 Questions and answers with Dumpstech

Market dialogue allows buyers to better understand supplier capabilities and refine their requirements. It promotes collaboration, helps clarify technical details, and indicates how much interest and competition exists in the market. However, it doesn’t replace the formal procurement process and still carries some risk if not managed transparently.

Advantages of using invitation to tender may be as below:

No Nepotism: Tenders or bids are evaluated on the basis of certain predetermined criteria, such as price, quality and value for money. In other words, the firm offering the highest quality product or service at the lowest price point would win the contract. As most tender documents are opened and evaluated in a public process, I think that there remains little room for nepotism or favoritism of any kind.

Value for Money: From the perspective of the client, tenders offer the greatest value for the amount of money spent. This is due to the fact that the client can choose from a wide pool of potential suppliers to select the ones that can produce the highest quality product or service at the lowest price point. This allows the company, establishment or organization to save money without having to compromise on quality. Therefore, despite being quite time consuming, tendering is, in my opinion, a profitable long-term process from an organization’s point of view.

Encourages Competition: The process of tendering helps promote a competitive market. This isbecause a number of potential contractors, firms or suppliers get a chance to bid for every project. And because selection depends on quality and price, every bidder tries to reduce operational inefficiencies and redundancies as much as possible in order to lower expenses and improve quality. This entire process encourages healthy competition in the market and prevents complacency and laziness, which in turn provides a boost to innovation and new ideas.

Easier Entry: The system of tendering makes it easier and simpler for new firms to enter the market or even a particular industry. This is due to the fact that contracts under this system are awarded on the basis of predetermined, objective criteria. As a result, even a firm that is a new entrant to the market, having no connections or contacts in the industry, can win a prestigious and lucrative contract by providing the highest value for the client’s money. This process therefore helps new firms to quickly get a foothold in the market or industry, thus significantly lowering the traditional barriers to entry.

To solve the question, you must distinguish the following notion:

- Offer: The case of Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 1 WLR 1403 outlines that an offer is: An expression of willingness to contract on specified terms, with the intention that it is to be binding once accepted

- Acceptance: in order for a contract to be formed, the offer must be accepted. Acceptance represents the meeting of the minds of the parties to the contract – both agree to exchange something for the other (payment, services, goods, etc.).

- Counter offer: is an offer made in response to a prior offer.

- Invitation to treat: An important distinction to make in contract law is that between an offer and an invitation to treat. An invitation to treat is usually an invitation for another party to make an offer. It may also be defined as an indication that a party is open to negotiation.

Here are some key distinctions of offers and invitation to treats.

Offer:

* Certain promise to be bound

* Clear and specified terms

* The conduct or words of the party show certainty

* There is no room for negotiation

Invitation to treat:

* There is room for negotiation

* There is an invitation for offers

* There is a request for information

* Lack of certainty

In the scenario above, initially Michelle just gives an invitation to treat because she is asking whether Hannah is interested to buy her car (request for information from Hannah). Hannah may reject or go into a negotiation with Michelle. Then, Hannah makes an offer by taking the money andshows her intention to be legally bound. At this point, when Hannah's offer is present, Michelle can accept or reject. When she rejects, the contract is not formed. The answer must be "No, because Michelle has rejected Hannah's offer on buying the car".

Hank’s pre-contractual assurances may amount to misrepresentation. Fraudulent misrepresentation is a strong possibility since Hank had carried out no investigations into the viability of the project timescales. This could amount to recklessness in using information without taking any steps to see if it is true or not.

The scenario above was constructed based on the case BSkyB v EDS, a famous case in IT sector.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Capacity means the legal ability to form a contract. A party lacks capacity if they are:

Of unsound mind or mental incapacity (1), or

A company acting beyond its powers (ultra vires) (4).

A failure to concentrate or being 19 years old does not affect legal capacity.

One of the major disadvantages of tendering process is that it is lengthy, bureaucratic and slow. To reduce the preparation time, buying organisation can:

- Plan forward

- Standardise tendering documents (such as notices, terms and conditions,...) whenever possible

- Train procurement staff

- Write down policies for tender-waiver

Buying organisation should not eliminate the pre-qualification stage from all tendering processes. This stage is used as a filter to select the most competent suppliers for next stage in restricted tendering. To save time in this process, you can design a model questionnaire.

Supplier standard terms and conditions are drafted:

To protect the supplier’s interests,

To limit the supplier’s liability,

To secure favourable payment and performance conditions for the supplier.

If the buying organisation accepts these without negotiation (especially in a rush), it risks ending up with contract conditions that are favourable to the supplier (D) and less favourable protections for itself.

Liquidated damages (LDs) are pre-agreed sums payable for specific breaches (commonly late delivery), intended as a genuine pre-estimate of loss.

Clause 1: £1,000 per server per day for late delivery → clear pre-agreed daily amount = LD.

Clause 3: £40,000 per day up to 50% of contract price → again, defined LD structure.

Clause 2: “Amount to be agreed” is uncertain and not a valid LD amount.

Clause 4: A full refund after five years for performance degradation is more like a warranty / guarantee, not a liquidated damages clause.

Thus, LD examples are 1 and 3 only → option C.

Procurement teams use key performance indicators (KPIs) to ensure vendors comply with (and hopefully exceed) the obligations outlined in a contract. They help us better understandsuppliers’ performance, measure their output over a long period of time, and identify areas where improvement is needed.

Put simply, it’s good business sense to make sure you’re actually getting what you’ve paid for. This might be as straightforward as confirming a product or service is delivered on time, which means the KPIs you need to use will be minimal and basic.

Procurement staff in the Hospital is forcing suppliers into fixed price contract. If the costs generally rise, supplier may operate at a loss. This situation can disrupt the relationship, that is the reason why some suppliers refusing to deal with BDH and a few going out of business mid-way.

Alternative methods could be variable pricing arrangement. This method would reimburse the fluctuation of market price. It will also benefit buyer if the market price drops. This type of arrangement should be applied to long-term contracts (i.e. 18 months or more).