Pass the Cisco CCNP Wireless 300-110 Questions and answers with Dumpstech

During a client roaming event in a Cisco SD-Access fabric deployment, the Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) is responsible for communicating the new Layer 2 Endpoint ID (EID) mapping of a wireless supplicant to the fabric domain. In the SD-Access architecture, the WLC acts as a mobility orchestrator and serves as the interface between the wireless domain and the wired fabric. When a client roams from one AP to another, the WLC detects the roaming event and updates the fabric control plane with the new EID-to-RLOC (Routing Locator) mapping by notifying the fabric control plane node (CP). This ensures that the fabric knows the client ' s new location and can route traffic correctly without interruption. The Border Node (BN) handles traffic between the fabric and external networks. CP1 and CP2 are control plane nodes that maintain the mapping database but receive EID update notifications from the WLC — they do not initiate the EID mapping communication themselves. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — SD-Access Wireless Architecture, Client Roaming in Fabric Deployments, EID Mapping and Control Plane Notifications.

This question requires straightforward wireless capacity engineering calculation. The total throughput requirement is 100 users × 1 Mbps per user = 100 Mbps aggregate. Each channel in the design can support 20 Mbps of usable throughput — this is the per-cell, per-channel allocation defined in the design parameters, representing usable throughput prior to RF overhead as stated in the question. The number of channels required is therefore: total required throughput divided by throughput per channel = 100 Mbps ÷ 20 Mbps per channel = 5 channels. In practice, each channel corresponds to a non-overlapping frequency assignment in the 5 GHz band. With 5 channels and 20 Mbps per channel, the design provides exactly 100 Mbps of aggregate capacity for 100 concurrent users at 1 Mbps each. This calculation methodology is foundational to Cisco ' s high-density WLAN design approach, where the number of spatial streams, channel allocations, and AP placement are all derived from the per-user throughput requirement multiplied by the concurrent user population. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — High-Density WLAN Capacity Planning, Per-User Throughput Calculation, Channel Planning and Spatial Reuse.

A pre-site survey questionnaire is used to gather information before the physical survey begins, helping to define design requirements. The two most important information points it should contain are the access point density required and the applications that will run over the wireless network. Access point density (Option C) must be understood early because it depends on the number and types of users in each area, directly influencing the survey approach and AP placement strategy. Applications (Option E) are critical because they define the QoS requirements — a company developing code may run video conferencing, large file transfers, and real-time collaboration tools, each with distinct bandwidth and latency requirements that shape the RF design criteria. The total number of existing APs (Option A) and the current controller model (Option D) are inventory questions, not design requirement inputs. Client device types (Option B) are important but are a subset of the application question — applications drive the specific device capability requirements. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Pre-Site Survey Requirements Gathering, Customer Questionnaire, Design Requirements Definition.

Link Aggregation Group (LAG) is the correct design approach for a single Cisco 9800-40 WLC that requires high availability between the WLC and the core switch in the event of a cable failure. LAG combines multiple physical ports on the WLC into a single logical channel, providing both redundancy (traffic automatically redistributes across remaining links when one fails) and load balancing (traffic is distributed across all active links). Importantly, LAG operates transparently to AP management — APs see a single logical uplink regardless of which physical port their traffic traverses. With a single WLC, Multi-LAG (Option B) is not applicable — Multi-LAG is a feature of the Catalyst 9800 that allows multiple separate LAG bundles for different network connections, typically used with SSO pairs. LACP (Option C) is the protocol used to negotiate LAG member links — it is the mechanism within LAG, not an independent design approach. PAgP (Option D) is a Cisco proprietary alternative to LACP for port aggregation but the question asks for the design approach, which is LAG. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Catalyst 9800 LAG Design, Port Redundancy and Load Balancing, Single-Controller High Availability.

In Cisco mesh networking architecture, access points are classified into two primary roles: Root Access Points (RAP) and Mesh Access Points (MAP). A RAP is an access point that maintains a wired Ethernet backhaul connection back to the network infrastructure, while a MAP operates wirelessly, relying on mesh backlinks to upstream RAPs. When an engineer needs to change an AP mode — such as switching to bridge mode to extend the mesh — the AP role must first be defined correctly. The AP must be designated as a RAP before any mode-level configuration changes are applied. This sequencing is critical because the AP role defines the fundamental backhaul path; changing the mode without first establishing the role results in misconfiguration and potential connectivity loss. The RAP communicates directly with the wired infrastructure via its Ethernet port, making it the gateway for all downstream MAPs in the mesh topology. Options A (monitor), C (bridge), and D (local) refer to AP modes, not roles, and cannot be configured until the role is properly defined. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Mesh Networking Fundamentals, Outdoor Wireless Design, AP Role and Mode Configuration.

When conducting a Layer 2 site survey, it is recommended to match the survey to the worst client available. This ensures that the wireless network is designed to provide adequate coverage and performance even for clients with the poorest RF capabilities, thereby providing a consistent user experience for all devices. The worst client typically has fewer antennas, lower receiver sensitivity, and less sophisticated chipsets. By designing to its limitations, the engineer guarantees that every device in the environment meets the minimum performance threshold. Using the best client (Option A) or an average client (Option C) would result in coverage gaps for less capable devices. A phone client (Option B) may have unique characteristics but is not a universally applicable standard for general survey purposes. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Site Survey Methodology, Client Selection for Survey, Layer 2 Pre-Deployment Survey.

When Cisco WLCs are configured to use multicast for mobility group communications, all WLCs participating in the same mobility group must be configured with an identical multicast group IP address. The mobility multicast mode allows a WLC to send a single multicast frame received simultaneously by all other WLCs in the group, rather than sending individual unicast copies to each peer. For this to function correctly, every WLC in the group must join the same IP multicast group address, and the underlying network infrastructure must be configured to support IP multicast routing or IGMP snooping for that specific group address. If any WLC is configured with a different multicast IP address, it will join a different multicast group and will not receive mobility messages from the other WLCs, effectively isolating it from the group ' s communication plane. Service port IP addresses (Option A) are unique per controller. Interface IDs (Option B) are locally significant identifiers. Management IP addresses (Option C) are unique per WLC and identify each peer in unicast configurations. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Mobility Group Configuration, Multicast Mobility Messaging, WLC Peer Communication.

Devices that can tolerate at most 100 ms of delay when roaming are voice devices. The 100 ms maximum roaming delay threshold is the Cisco-specified design criterion for VoWLAN implementations — it defines the maximum time a handset can tolerate being disconnected from the wireless network during a roam event before the voice call is degraded or dropped. This threshold drives specific design requirements: 15-20% cell overlap at -67 dBm, fast roaming mechanisms (802.11r, CCKM, or OKC), and AP placement along user movement paths. Location services (Option A) have flexible latency requirements. Data applications (Option B) can tolerate much higher latency — typically several hundred milliseconds. Video (Option C) streaming has buffering mechanisms that allow for higher latency tolerance than real-time voice. Only voice applications have the strict 100 ms roaming delay requirement that directly influences the predictive design criteria. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — VoWLAN Roaming Design, Roaming Delay Requirements, Predictive Survey Criteria.