Pass the Cisco CCNP Enterprise 300-445 Questions and answers with Dumpstech

Establishing an accurate baseline is a cornerstone of theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)methodology. A baseline must represent the "typical" behavior of the network across its standard operating cycle to be useful for anomaly detection and capacity planning. When monitoring interface utilization on a critical link, it is vital tocapture both peak and off-peak traffic patterns(Option C).

Most enterprise networks exhibit cyclical traffic patterns, often referred to as "diurnal" cycles, where utilization spikes during business hours (peak) and drops significantly at night or on weekends (off-peak). If an engineer only collects data during the lowest volume period (Option A), the baseline will be unrealistically low, leading to "false positive" alerts when normal business traffic returns. Conversely, only capturing peak data might hide background synchronization tasks or backup windows that occur during off-hours.

By selecting a representative time period—typically one full week or a month—the engineer ensures the baseline accounts for variations such as Monday morning "logon storms," mid-week steady states, and weekend maintenance. This comprehensive view allows the assurance platform (such asCisco Catalyst CenterorThousandEyes) to calculate a standard deviation and establish dynamic thresholds. If utilization deviates from these historically representative norms, the system can trigger an alert based on a true anomaly rather than a predictable daily surge. Aligning with a financial year (Option B) is irrelevant to technical performance, and limiting the data (Option D) compromises the baseline's statistical validity.

In theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)curriculum, capacity planning and optimization are driven by telemetry data such as NetFlow. When NetFlow identifies that delay and jitter—metrics highly impactful to real-time traffic—spike during peak hours, it indicates that high-priority packets are competing for resources with bulk data.

The most appropriate recommendation is totune the existing QoS configuration(Option C). This involves adjusting the Queuing and Scheduling policies on the routers to ensure that voice and video traffic (typically marked with EF and AF41/AF42 DSCP values) is serviced before other traffic classes during periods of congestion. This solution is targeted, cost-effective, and directly addresses the observed jitter issues without the need for massive capital expenditure.

Reviewing other options:

Option A:A complete QoS redesign is often unnecessary and too invasive for solving peak-hour jitter if a basic QoS framework is already in place.

Option B:Increasing bandwidth on "all" links is a "brute force" approach that is expensive and fails to address the underlying problem of traffic prioritization.

Option D:Hardware replacement is a last resort and would not resolve delay/jitter if the new hardware still lacks a properly tuned QoS policy.

In theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)architecture, a critical design consideration is the impact of the monitoring solution on the production environment. The primary advantage ofpassive monitoring(Option B) is its non-intrusive nature; it provides insights into network performance and traffic composition without injecting additional "synthetic" overhead into the data plane.

Passive techniques—such asCisco Meraki Insight (MI), NetFlow, and SNMP—rely on the telemetry generated by existing user traffic or the device's own control plane. For example, Meraki Insight analyzes HTTP/S flows as they naturally pass through a Meraki MX appliance to derive application performance scores, rather than sending separate probes.5This ensures that the monitoring tool itself does not consume bandwidth or contribute to network congestion, which is particularly vital in bandwidth-constrained branch environments or on high-utilization links.

In contrast,active monitoring(Options A and C) requires the deliberate generation of synthetic traffic, which can potentially skew results if the volume is too high or if the network is already at capacity. While active monitoring is essential for proactive troubleshooting (measuring performance before users complain), passive monitoring is the preferred method for long-term historical analysis of real user experience and infrastructure utilization because it captures what is actually happening on the wire. Option D is a shared capability; both types can measure specific services, but only passive monitoring does so while remaining transparent to the network load. Therefore, the lack of added traffic is the definitive advantage of the passive approach.

According to theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)curriculum, the integration between ThousandEyes andWebex Control Hubprovides a streamlined troubleshooting experience for collaboration services. For the VoIP team to access the specific ThousandEyes network telemetry—such as latency, loss, and jitter—they must navigate to theNetwork Path(Option B) section within the Troubleshooting tab of the Control Hub.15

TheNetwork Pathvisualization is a direct result of the ThousandEyes Endpoint Agent data being pulled into the Webex interface.16When a user or RoomOS device experiences poor audio or video quality during a meeting, the Control Hub's troubleshooting view displays a "Network Path" line under the participant's details.17By clicking on this line, the VoIP team can see a hop-by-hop breakdown of the entire route from the collaboration device to the Webex media node. This view highlights specific hops where performance is "Poor" (red), "Fair" (yellow), or "Good" (green) based on predefined thresholds for latency (>400ms) or loss (>5%).

While "Devices" (Option A) is where the agents are activated, and "Users" (Option C) allows for selecting a specific participant, the actualtelemetry metricsand the visualization of the network route are strictly located in theNetwork Pathview. This integration eliminates the need for the VoIP team to leave the Webex environment for initial triage, as they can identify if a problem is local to the branch office or deep within a service provider's network directly from the "Network Path" dashboard.

According to theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)guidelines, troubleshooting widespread performance issues for a public or data center-hosted app17lication requires an "outside-in" perspective. When reports are widespread,18the goal is to determine if the issue is global, regional, or specific to certain ISP paths leading to the data center.

TheCloud Agent(Option D) is the most effective tool for this task because these agents are maintained by Cisco ThousandEyes in over 240+ locations worldwide within Tier 1, 2, and 3 ISPs and cloud provider regions.19Because they arepre-deployed and immediately available, a network engineer can instantly run tests from multiple global locations toward the data center-hosted application without having to install any software or manage any infrastructure. This allows the engineer to quickly compare performance metrics (latency, loss, and page load times) across different geographies. If Cloud Agents in London report no issues while those in New York report high packet loss, the engineer can immediately pinpoint the root cause as a regional ISP or peering issue rather than a failure within the data center itself.

Enterprise Agent (Option B):While these could be used if they were already installed in various branch offices, they require ownership of the infrastructure and deployment time. They are better suited for "inside-out" monitoring.

Endpoint Agent (Option C):These are useful for troubleshooting individual user experience but are not the "quickest" way to baseline global performance against a data center application during a widespread event.

Synthetic Agent (Option A):As noted previously, this is a generic term describing the underlying technology used by all ThousandEyes agent types.

Therefore,Cloud Agentsprovide the necessary breadth and immediate availability to perform rapid root cause analysis for widespread application performance issues.

As shown inExhibit 4.1-1(image_6e19fb.png), the alert rule is configured for the BGP layer with the name "AS origin AS 1234". The critical logic is defined in theAlert Conditionssection, which specifies: BGP Origin meets all of: ASN not in 1234.

This specific configuration is the standard method used in ThousandEyes to detectBGP hijacking(Option C). BGP hijacking occurs when an unauthorized Autonomous System (AS) announces a network prefix that it does not own, effectively stealing the traffic meant for the legitimate owner. By setting an alert that triggers when a monitored prefix is seen originating from an Autonomous System Number (ASN) that isnotthe expected authorized ASN (in this case, AS 1234), ThousandEyes provides immediate notification of a routing takeover.

Identifying this via BGP Origin alerts is superior to simple connectivity checks because it catches the issue at the routing control plane.

DNS Issues (Options B and D):These involve the translation of names to IPs and would be detected via DNS-specific tests rather than BGP Origin checks.

Route Poisoning (Option A):This is a generic term often referring to the manipulation of distance-vector protocol metrics to make a route unreachable; while related to routing, BGP Origin checks are the specific tool for detecting external prefix hijacks.

By monitoring the ASN origin, network engineers can quickly distinguish between a local ISP outage and a global security event where their traffic is being misdirected to an illegitimate network.

Under theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)guidelines, the integration between ThousandEyes andCisco Secure Client(formerly AnyConnect) is designed to provide visibility into the hybrid workforce experience. The integration primarily leveragesnetwork performance data from the user's device(Option C) to diagnose connectivity and application issues.

This data is collected by theThousandEyes Endpoint Agent, which is deployed as a module within the Cisco Secure Client.10The agent captures real-time telemetry from the user's laptop or workstation, includingWi-Fi signal strength,CPU and memory utilization, andlocal network gateway latency. Specifically, for remote users, it monitors the health of the VPN tunnel and the performance of applications as seen from the end-user's vantage point.

When a user reports a "slow application," this integrated telemetry allows IT teams to determine if the root cause is the user's home Wi-Fi, a saturated VPN concentrator, or an issue within the ISP underlay. The agent performsAutomated Session Testing (AST), which maps the network path as soon as a user joins a critical meeting or accesses a SaaS tool, providing a granular view of every hop between the device and the service destination. Unlike hardware configuration data (Option A) or behavioral analytics (Option B), the focus here is strictly on thenetwork performance metricsthat impact digital experience.

Therefore, the collection of device-centric network performance data is the core function of the Cisco Secure Client and ThousandEyes integration.

In theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)framework, a common architectural hurdle is monitoring applications protected by Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). ThousandEyes transaction tests utilize automated browser sessions to simulate user behavior, but they face inherent limitations when interacting with "out-of-band" security mechanisms.

Specifically, ThousandEyes agents cannot natively interact with external hardware tokens, biometric prompts, or mobile-app-based OTP generators (Option A). Since an OTP is dynamic and time-sensitive, manually entering it into a static test configuration (Option B) is impossible for an automated, recurring test. While some complex workhooks (Option C) might theoretically interface with a virtual MFA service, this introduces significant security risks and architectural complexity that is generally discouraged in a standard assurance design.

The verified and most practical approach is toexclude the MFA step from the transaction test and focus only on the SAML login(Option D). For monitoring purposes, IT teams often create a "synthetic user" account within the Identity Provider (IdP) that is specifically exempted from MFA policies when originating from known ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent IP addresses. This allows the transaction script to validate the availability and performance of the SAML-based SSO redirect, the credential challenge, and the final application landing page. This strategy ensures that the network and application health can be baselined without the test being blocked by a security gate it was never intended to pass.

According to theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)data analysis guidelines, identifying the underlying test type is the first step in interpreting a dashboard. By observing the metrics displayed across both the Executive and IT Operations dashboards, we can definitively identify the test type asPage Load(Option B).

A Page Load test is a Web-layer test that uses a browser engine (Chromium) to fully render a page and collect advanced metrics beyond simple availability. Evidence for this test type in the dashboards includes:

Page Completion Time:Displayed on the Executive dashboard map, this metric is specific to how much of the page successfully rendered.

DOM Load Time:Found in the IT Operations dashboard, the Document Object Model (DOM) time is a browser-centric metric that measures when the page structure has finished loading.

Waterfall Charts:While not a specific answer option, these are the foundation of Page Load tests, allowing for the timing of individual web components.

SimpleHTTP Servertests (Option A) only measure availability and response codes, missing the rendering metrics seen here.Agent to server(Option C) is a network-layer test that provides path visualization but no browser-level data.FTP(Option D) is a protocol-specific test not used for web application monitoring. Therefore, the presence of DOM and Page Completion metrics confirms thePage Loadtest type.