Pass the IIA CIA IIA-CIA-Part3 Questions and answers with Dumpstech

Understanding Matrix Organizations:

A matrix organization is a hybrid structure that combines functional and project-based structures, where employees report to multiple managers (e.g., a functional manager and a project manager).

These organizations adapt to projects by adjusting authority, responsibility, and accountability based on the project's stage or the organization's culture.

Why Option C Is Correct?

In a matrix organization, roles and decision-making authority evolve based on the project's phase, size, or complexity.

Employees might report to different managers at different times, and accountability structures may change.

This aligns with IIA Standard 2110 – Governance, which emphasizes clear roles and responsibilities in dynamic organizational structures.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Unity-of-command concept):

The unity-of-command principle states that employees should report to only one superior, which contradicts the nature of a matrix organization, where dual reporting exists.

Option B (Combination of product and functional departments allows management to utilize personnel from various functions):

While matrix organizations integrate product and functional departments, the key defining feature is the variable authority, responsibility, and accountability, making option C a better fit.

Option D (Best suited for firms with scattered locations or large-scale firms):

While matrix structures can be used in large firms, they are not limited to them and are often found in project-based industries (e.g., engineering, IT, consulting).

Matrix organizations adapt their authority structures based on project needs, making option C the best choice.

IIA Standard 2110 supports governance structures that evolve with organizational needs.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance (Organizational Structure & Accountability)

COSO ERM – Governance & Decision-Making in Matrix Organizations

Losing the only IT auditor in the internal audit function significantly impacts the ability to perform IT audits in the approved plan. This resource limitation requires the CAE to revise the plan and seek board approval for changes.

Option A does not change the plan. Option C was foreseeable and should already have been included in prior planning. Option D has no material impact since the vacancy was quickly filled with a qualified replacement.

In advisory engagements, internal audit may provide consulting support that enhances processes while maintaining objectivity. In this case, the most appropriate value-adding activity is to facilitate development of a checklist for documenting asset transfers. This addresses the identified gap directly and supports management in strengthening controls.

Option A identifies risks but does not resolve the gap. Option C (root cause analysis) is not as practical in this advisory setting. Option D (resource allocation) is a management responsibility, not internal audit’s role.

Understanding Capital Budgeting Techniques:

Capital budgeting helps organizations evaluate long-term investment decisions based on expected cash flows.

NPV (Net Present Value) considers total expected net cash flows over the investment’s life and discounts them to present value.

Why Option D (Net Present Value) Is Correct?

NPV calculates the present value of future net cash flows, adjusting for the time value of money.

If NPV is positive, the investment is considered profitable.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management emphasizes financial decision-making tools like NPV for evaluating investment risks.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Cash Payback):

Measures time to recover initial investment but does not consider total net cash flows.

Option B (Annual Rate of Return):

Uses accounting income, not cash flows, and does not factor in the time value of money.

Option C (Incremental Analysis):

Compares alternative options but does not evaluate total cash flows from an investment.

NPV is the correct method as it evaluates total expected cash flows over time.

IIA Standard 2120 supports financial analysis in investment decision-making.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2120 – Risk Management (Capital Budgeting & Investment Risks)

COSO ERM – Financial Risk Management & Decision Analysis

Financial Management Best Practices – NPV Analysis

Audit observations should include condition, criteria, cause, and effect. In this case, the condition (delay risk), criteria (schedule), and effect (penalties) are already presented. What is missing is the cause—the underlying reason for the project delay. Identifying the cause ensures recommendations address the root of the problem.

In the context of big data governance, the responsibilities of various stakeholders are delineated as follows:

A. Management's Responsibilities:

Management holds the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining effective data governance frameworks. This includes ensuring that information storage systems are appropriately defined and that processes for updating critical data elements are clear and well-documented. Such measures are essential to maintain data integrity, availability, and confidentiality. The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) emphasizes that management is accountable for the design and implementation of data governance structures, policies, and procedures. These structures should encompass data storage solutions and the mechanisms for updating and managing critical data elements.

The Institute of Internal Auditors

B. External Auditors' Responsibilities:

External auditors are tasked with providing independent assurance on the effectiveness of an organization's financial reporting and related controls. While they may consider the implications of big data on financial reporting, their primary focus is not on the periodic monitoring and maintenance of analytical models. Instead, this responsibility typically falls under management or specialized internal functions. The IIA outlines that external auditors assess the overall control environment but do not directly manage or maintain analytical models.

C. The Board's Responsibilities:

The board of directors provides oversight and strategic direction for the organization's data governance initiatives. However, the implementation of specific controls around data quality dimensions is generally delegated to management. The board ensures that appropriate governance structures are in place and that management is effectively addressing data quality and governance issues. According to the IIA, the board's role is to oversee the data governance framework, ensuring that management has implemented effective controls and processes.

The Institute of Internal Auditors

D. Internal Auditors' Responsibilities:

Internal auditors provide independent assurance on the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and control processes, including those related to data quality and security. While they assess and report on the adequacy of controls over data, the responsibility for ensuring data quality and security rests with management. The IIA states that internal auditors evaluate the effectiveness of data governance practices but do not hold primary responsibility for data quality and security.

The Institute of Internal Auditors

In summary, option A accurately reflects management's responsibility in big data governance, aligning with the IIA's guidelines on data governance roles and responsibilities.

Ransomware is a type of cyberattack where malicious software encrypts an organization's data, making it inaccessible until a ransom is paid to the attacker. This aligns with the question’s scenario, where denial-of-service is caused by malicious data encryption.

Let's analyze the options:

A. Phishing:

Phishing is a social engineering attack that tricks individuals into providing sensitive information, such as usernames, passwords, or credit card numbers. It does not involve encryption or direct denial-of-service.

B. Ransomware (✅ Correct Answer):

Ransomware encrypts critical data and demands a ransom for its release, effectively causing a denial-of-service scenario since the victim cannot access their own systems.

Some well-known ransomware attacks include WannaCry and NotPetya.

C. Hacking:

Hacking is a broad term for unauthorized access to systems but does not specifically refer to denial-of-service through encryption. Ransomware is a specific type of hacking attack.

D. Malware:

Malware (malicious software) is a general category that includes viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, and ransomware. While ransomware is a type of malware, not all malware encrypts data to demand ransom.

IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) – Auditing Cybersecurity Risks – Discusses various cyber threats, including ransomware.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) – Defines ransomware as a major threat that disrupts business continuity.

COBIT Framework (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies) – Addresses risks associated with ransomware and how internal auditors should assess controls.

ISO/IEC 27001 – Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) – Identifies the importance of cybersecurity measures to prevent ransomware attacks.

IIA References:

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

A matrix organization combines functional and product-based structures, allowing employees to work across multiple departments and report to multiple managers. This enables businesses to utilize expertise from various areas efficiently.

Option A (Unity of command) does not apply to matrix organizations, as employees often report to multiple supervisors.

Option C (Variable authority and accountability) is a secondary characteristic but does not define matrix structures.

Option D (Best for scattered locations/multi-line firms) applies more to divisional rather than matrix structures.

Thus, the correct answer is B, as matrix structures enable collaboration across functional and product teams.

Automated attacks that attempt to exploit weak or leaked passwords—such as credential stuffing, brute force attacks, and dictionary attacks—pose a significant cybersecurity risk. Implementing two-step verification (also known as multi-factor authentication, or MFA) is one of the most effective measures to mitigate these threats.

Why Two-Step Verification is Effective (B - Correct Answer)

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) adds an additional security layer beyond a password, requiring a second factor such as a one-time code sent to a mobile device, biometric authentication, or a security key.

Even if an attacker obtains a password, they cannot access the account without the second authentication factor.

The IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 1: Information Security Management emphasizes the use of multi-factor authentication to prevent unauthorized access.

Why Other Options Are Less Effective:

Option A: Changing passwords every two years

Ineffective because attackers often use compromised credentials that may be recent. Best practices recommend regular password updates but coupled with MFA.

The IIA's GTAG 16: Identity and Access Management highlights that password rotation alone does not fully protect against automated attacks.

Option C: Using a VPN when out of the office

Irrelevant to password attacks. A VPN encrypts data and secures network connections but does not prevent brute force or credential stuffing attacks.

The IIA GTAG 17: Auditing Network Security discusses VPNs for secure remote access but does not consider them a solution for password-based attacks.

Option D: Using antivirus and security tools

While important for overall security, these tools cannot prevent attacks that exploit stolen or weak passwords.

The IIA GTAG 15: Information Security Governance states that security tools should be combined with authentication controls like MFA for best protection.

GTAG 1: Information Security Management – Recommends multi-factor authentication to prevent unauthorized system access.

GTAG 16: Identity and Access Management – Highlights the limitations of password-only security and supports multi-factor authentication.

GTAG 17: Auditing Network Security – Covers VPN usage but does not consider it a solution for password attacks.

GTAG 15: Information Security Governance – Discusses the role of security tools and authentication in securing user accounts.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, requiring two-step verification (B) is the most effective control against automated password attacks.

Organizations that rely on third-party vendors for IT services must ensure secure and controlled communication, especially in areas where external connections are involved. External connections typically include:

Cloud services (e.g., SaaS, PaaS, IaaS)

Third-party APIs

Remote access (VPNs, firewalls, network gateways)

IoT devices and external sensors

These connections introduce cybersecurity risks, requiring continuous monitoring, vendor communication, and security controls.

(A) Applications.

Incorrect. While application security is important, it is typically managed internally. Vendor involvement is needed for software patches and updates, but communication is not as tightly monitored.

(B) Technical infrastructure.

Incorrect. This layer includes internal IT components like servers, databases, and networks, which are mostly managed in-house. Vendor involvement is required for hardware/software updates but not to the same extent as external connections.

(C) External connections. ✅

Correct. External connections require tightly controlled communication with vendors to prevent security breaches, unauthorized access, and data leaks.

IIA GTAG "Auditing IT Governance" highlights third-party risk management as a key area for IT audits.

IIA Standard 2110 requires organizations to establish governance structures for vendor and IT security management.

(D) IT management.

Incorrect. IT management focuses on internal oversight of IT policies and compliance, but does not necessarily require tightly controlled vendor communication.

IIA GTAG – "Auditing IT Governance"

IIA GTAG – "Managing Third-Party Risks"

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References:

Understanding Mobile Device Risks in an Organization:

When an organization allows third parties (vendors and visitors) to use outside smart devices to access its proprietary networks and systems, it introduces significant compliance risks.

These risks include violations of regulatory requirements, industry standards, and internal security policies.

Compliance Risks in Smart Device Usage:

Unauthorized Access: External users may bypass security controls, leading to data breaches or regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS violations).

Lack of Encryption and Data Protection: If smart devices access sensitive information without proper security protocols, the organization may fail to comply with industry regulations.

Failure to Enforce Mobile Device Management (MDM): Without proper policy enforcement, organizations risk failing audits and facing penalties.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Privacy:

Privacy concerns relate to handling personal data, but in this scenario, the focus is on third-party access risks, which fall under compliance.

C. Strategic:

Strategic risks relate to long-term business objectives, whereas compliance risks are more immediate and regulatory in nature.

D. Physical security:

Physical security deals with preventing unauthorized access to buildings or devices, not cybersecurity risks from external smart devices.

IIA’s Perspective on Compliance and IT Security:

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance emphasizes the need to evaluate IT security risks, including third-party access risks.

IIA GTAG (Global Technology Audit Guide) on IT Risks highlights compliance risks in Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and third-party access policies.

ISO 27001 Information Security Standard mandates controls to manage external device access risks.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance and IT Security

IIA GTAG – IT Risks and BYOD Policies

ISO 27001 Information Security Standard

NIST Cybersecurity Framework for Mobile Device Security

Thus, the correct and verified answer is A. Compliance.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Password selection is the most dependent on the user, as it involves choosing and setting a secure password that meets organizational security requirements.

Option B (Password aging) – Controlled by system settings, not directly by the user.

Option C (Password lockout) – Automatically triggered after failed login attempts.

Option D (Password rotation) – Enforced by system policies, not the individual user’s decision.

Since password security starts with user selection, Option A is correct.

Understanding Copyright Issues and Smart Devices:

Copyright laws protect software, firmware, and intellectual property embedded in smart devices.

Jailbreaking refers to modifying a device’s software to remove manufacturer-imposed restrictions, often to install unauthorized third-party apps.

This violates software licensing agreements and may infringe on copyright protections under laws like the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Why Option B (Jailbreaking) Is Correct?

Jailbreaking allows users to bypass manufacturer restrictions, potentially leading to unauthorized software distribution and copyright violations.

Manufacturers implement Digital Rights Management (DRM) to protect copyrighted firmware and software, which jailbreaking circumvents.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance includes evaluating intellectual property risks and compliance in IT audits.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Session hijacking):

This is a cybersecurity attack where a hacker takes control of a user session. It does not impact copyright laws.

Option C (Eavesdropping):

Eavesdropping refers to unauthorized network surveillance, which is a privacy issue, not a copyright issue.

Option D (Authentication):

Authentication is a security mechanism to verify user identity and has no direct relation to copyright concerns.

Jailbreaking bypasses copyright protections and violates software licensing agreements, making it the best answer.

IIA Standard 2110 emphasizes the importance of IT governance and compliance with intellectual property laws.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance (Intellectual Property & IT Compliance)

ISO 27001 – IT Security & Digital Rights Protection

Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) – Copyright Protection for Software

The IIA Standards emphasize that the internal audit plan must remain dynamic and responsive to changes in risks and priorities. If significant risks are identified after the plan has been approved, the CAE must revise the plan and communicate the interim changes to senior management and the board for review and approval.

Option A ignores emerging risks. Option C delays addressing significant risks. Option D bypasses governance approval and does not respect the board’s oversight role.