Pass the Cisco CCNP Security 350-701 Questions and answers with Dumpstech

Explanation

The appliance will try once to upload the file; if upload is not successful, for example because of

connectivity problems, the file may not be uploaded. If the failure was because the file analysis server was overloaded, the upload will be attempted once more.

single methods of authentication can be compromised more easily than MFA. MFA, or multi-factor authentication, is a security process that requires users to provide two or more factors to verify their identity and access resources. MFA reduces the risk of unauthorized access by making it harder for attackers to compromise all the factors needed, especially if they are different in nature, such as something you know (password), something you have (token), and something you are (biometric).

To understand the concept of MFA and why it is important for authentication security, you can refer to the following sections of the source book:

Section 1.1.1: Describe the concepts of identity and access management

Section 1.1.1.1: Describe the concepts of identity principles

Section 1.1.1.2: Describe the concepts of authentication

Section 1.1.1.3: Describe the concepts of authorization

Section 1.1.1.4: Describe the concepts of accounting

Section 1.1.1.5: Describe the concepts of identity stores

Section 1.1.1.6: Describe the concepts of MFA

Explanation

To understand DHCP snooping we need to learn about DHCP spoofing attack first.

DHCP spoofing is a type of attack in that the attacker listens for DHCP Requests from clients and answers them with fake DHCP Response before the authorized DHCP Response comes to the clients. The fake DHCP Response often gives its IP address as the client default gateway - > all the traffic sent from the client will go through the attacker computer, the attacker becomes a “man-in-the-middle”.

The attacker can have some ways to make sure its fake DHCP Response arrives first. In fact, if the attacker is “closer” than the DHCP Server then he doesn’t need to do anything. Or he can DoS the DHCP Server so that it can’t send the DHCP Response.

DHCP snooping can prevent DHCP spoofing attacks. DHCP snooping is a Cisco Catalyst feature that

determines which switch ports can respond to DHCP requests. Ports are identified as trusted and untrusted.

Only ports that connect to an authorized DHCP server are trusted, and allowed to send all types of DHCP

messages. All other ports on the switch are untrusted and can send only DHCP requests. If a DHCP response is seen on an untrusted port, the port is shut down.

The port connected to a DHCP server should be configured as trusted port with the “ip dhcp snooping trust” command. Other ports connecting to hosts are untrusted ports by default.

In this question, we need to configure the uplink to “trust” (under interface Gi1/0/1) as shown below.

Explanation

The data plane of any network is responsible for handling data packets that are transported across the network.

(The data plane is also sometimes called the forwarding plane.)

Maybe this Qwants to ask about the encryption and authentication in the data plane of a SD-WAN network (but SD-WAN is not a topic of the SCOR 350-701 exam?).

In the Cisco SD-WAN network for unicast traffic, data plane encryption is done by AES-256-GCM, a symmetrickey algorithm that uses the same key to encrypt outgoing packets and to decrypt incoming packets. Each router periodically generates an AES key for its data path (specifically, one key per TLOC) and transmits this key to the vSmart controller in OMP route packets, which are similar to IP route updates.

Transparently identify users with authentication realms – This option is available when one or more authentication realms are configured to support transparent identification using one of the following authentication servers:

Active Directory – Create an NTLM or Kerberos authentication realm and enable transparent user identification. In addition, you must deploy a separate Active Directory agent such as Cisco’s Context Directory Agent. For more information, see Transparent User Identification with Active Directory.

LDAP – Create an LDAP authentication realm configured as an eDirectory, and enable transparent user identification. For more information, see Transparent User Identification with LDAP.

Details:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/wsa/wsa11-0/user_guide/b_WSA_UserGuide/b_WSA_UserGuide_chapter_01001.html#:~:text=Transparently%20identify%20users%20with%20authentication,User%20Identification%20with%20LDAP.

The Talos IP and Domain Reputation Center is the world’s most comprehensive real-time threat detection network. It collects and analyzes data from millions of web requests, emails, malware samples, open-source data sets, endpoint intelligence, and network intrusions. It assigns a reputation score to IP addresses and domains based on their observed malicious activity and behavior. The reputation score can range from -10 (very malicious) to +10 (very benign). The reputation score can be used to block or allow traffic, or to trigger further inspection or analysis. The Talos IP and Domain Reputation Center allows you to track the reputation of IP addresses for email and web traffic, as well as to look up the category, volume, and history of any IP address or domain. You can also submit feedback or request a change of reputation for any IP address or domain. References 

https://talosintelligence.com/reputation_center/

https://bing.com/search?q=Talos+reputation+center+IP+addresses+email+web+traffic

Cisco Secure Firewall implements website control through URL filtering conditions in access control rules. Category-and-reputation filtering classifies websites by type, enabling a blocking access control rule to deny categories such as social networking while permitting unrelated web use. This is web filtering applied through an access control policy, making option C correct. A global default setting alone does not define the category-specific enforcement required. File policies inspect or control files transferred through permitted connections and do not provide website-category blocking. Option D is incorrectly worded because URL categories are configured as URL conditions, not as destination-network objects in the rule’s destination-network condition. After defining and ordering the blocking rule, the administrator must deploy the access control policy to the managed Threat Defense device. Cisco Secure Firewall URL-filtering guide

The overall score is a composite risk judgment, not a simple average of the visible Lexical, TLD, Geo Popularity, and Keyword values. The decisive evidence is the Umbrella Block Status at 100/100, the Malware Block List label, the Malware security category, and the explicit High Risk classification. Blank Recent IP, ASN, and registrant fields can occur when a domain is not currently resolving; they do not override reputation or block-list intelligence. Thus, option B correctly reconciles the score with the exhibit. Option A invents a rendering error. Option C ignores the stronger Umbrella block signal, and option D incorrectly treats a Dispute Categorization link as proof that the verdict is contested. Cisco defines 100 as the highest Investigate risk and explains that scores derive from multiple domain and request characteristics. Cisco risk-score documentation confirms this model.

================

Explanation

Application layer protocols can represent the same data in a variety of ways. The Firepower System provides

application layer protocol decoders that normalize specific types of packet data into formats that the intrusion

rules engine can analyze. Normalizing application-layer protocol encodings allows the rules engine to effectively

apply the same content-related rules to packets whose data is represented differently and obtain meaningful

results.

Explanation

The Firepower System uses network discovery and identity policies to collect host, application, and user data

for traffic on your network. You can use certain types of discovery and identity data to build a comprehensive

map of your network assets, perform forensic analysis, behavioral profiling, access control, and mitigate and

respond to the vulnerabilities and exploits to which your organization is susceptible.

You can configure your network discovery policy to perform host and application detection.

According to the NIST 800-145 guide1, a community cloud is a cloud infrastructure that is provisioned for exclusive use by a specific community of consumers from organizations that have shared concerns (e.g., mission, security requirements, policy, and compliance considerations). It may be owned, managed, and operated by one or more of the organizations in the community, a third party, or some combination of them, and it may exist on or off premises. A community cloud is different from a hybrid cloud, which is a composition of two or more distinct cloud infrastructures (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities, but are bound together by standardized or proprietary technology that enables data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting for load balancing between clouds). A private cloud is a cloud infrastructure that is provisioned for exclusive use by a single organization comprising multiple consumers (e.g., business units). It may be owned, managed, and operated by the organization, a third party, or some combination of them, and it may exist on or off premises. A public cloud is a cloud infrastructure that is provisioned for open use by the general public. It may be owned, managed, and operated by a business, academic, or government organization, or some combination of them. It exists on the premises of the cloud provider. References :=

Some possible references are:

1: NIST SP 800-145, The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, 1 2: Evaluation of Cloud Computing Services Based on NIST SP 800-145, 3 3: What Is Community Cloud? Definition, Architecture, Examples, and Best Practices, 6

 Cisco ISE supports two types of WebAuth for BYOD: central WebAuth and local WebAuth. Central WebAuth is the default method and it uses the ISE portal to authenticate the users and redirect them to the BYOD portal. Local WebAuth is an alternative method that uses the network access device (NAD) portal to authenticate the users and then redirects them to the ISE BYOD portal. Both methods require the configuration of a guest component on ISE, which is used to create the BYOD portal and the guest user accounts. The guest component also provides the self-service onboarding and registration features for the BYOD users. The dual component is not related to BYOD, but rather to the dual-SSID method, which uses two separate SSIDs for provisioning and access. The null WebAuth component is not a valid option for BYOD. References :=

Some possible references are:

Cisco ISE BYOD Prescriptive Deployment Guide

Configure Single SSID Wireless BYOD on Windows and ISE

Cisco ISE for BYOD and Secure Unified Access, 2nd Edition

One of the benefits of a Cisco Secure Email Gateway Virtual appliance compared to a physical one is the ability to allocate additional resources as needed. Virtual appliances can be easily scaled up by allocating more CPU, memory, or storage resources, providing flexibility and scalability in response to changing demands or growth.

The forwarder must know every receiving indexer and receive that configuration through a scalable deployment mechanism. In outputs.conf, a TCP output target group lists the indexer addresses and receiving ports, allowing forwarding traffic to be load-balanced automatically among those destinations. With thousands of Universal Forwarders, the practical method is to package outputs.conf in an application and distribute it through a Splunk deployment server. Disabling load balancing contradicts the distribution requirement. A local file share and scheduled copy operation bypass normal continuous forwarding and introduce delivery and integrity risks. Configuring a single forced primary indexer would concentrate traffic and create a potential bottleneck or failure point. Queue sizing may improve buffering but does not define the indexer destinations or distribute the configuration centrally. Splunk outputs.conf specification

================