Pass the Cisco CCNP Security 350-701 Questions and answers with Dumpstech

The Cisco WSA can enforce bandwidth restrictions for web applications by using the Application Visibility and Control (AVC) engine. The AVC engine allows the WSA to identify and control application activity on the network, and to apply bandwidth limits to certain application types or individual applications. The WSA dynamically creates a scavenger class QoS policy and applies it to each client that connects through the WSA. The scavenger class QoS policy assigns a low priority to the application traffic and limits the bandwidth usage based on the configured settings. This way, the WSA can prevent congestion and ensure fair allocation of bandwidth among different applications and users. References:

User Guide for AsyncOS 11.8 for Cisco Web Security Appliances - GD (General Deployment) - Managing Access to Web Applications

WSA - limit bandwidth - Cisco Community

Explanation

Posture is a service in Cisco Identity Services Engine (Cisco ISE) that allows you to check the state, also

known as posture, of all the endpoints that are connecting to a network for compliance with corporate security

policies.

A posture policy is a collection of posture requirements that are associated with one or more identity groups and

operating systems.

Posture-policy requirements can be set to mandatory, optional, or audit types in posture policies.

+ If a mandatory requirement fails, the user will be moved to Non-Compliant state

+ If an optional requirement fails, the user is allowed to skip the specified optional requirements and the user

is moved to Compliant state

This Qdid not clearly specify the type of posture policy requirement (mandatory or optional) is not met so the

user can be in Non-compliant or compliant state. But “noncompliant” is the best answer here.

The WSA uses a root certificate and a private key to decrypt HTTPS traffic. The root certificate must reside in the trusted store of the WSA, and it must be able to sign server certificates on the fly. The server certificates that the WSA generates must contain a SAN (Subject Alternative Name) field, which specifies the hostnames or IP addresses that the certificate is valid for. The SAN field is required by modern browsers and applications to verify the identity of the server. If the WSA does not include a SAN field in the server certificate, the browser or application may reject the connection or display a warning message.

The other options are not correct because:

A. The current date is not a criterion for the WSA to use a certificate to decrypt application traffic. The WSA checks the validity period of the certificate, which includes the start date and the end date. The current date must be within the validity period, but it does not have to be the same as the start date or the end date.

C. The root certificate that the WSA uses to decrypt HTTPS traffic does not have to reside in the trusted store of the endpoint. However, the endpoint must trust the root certificate in order to accept the server certificate that the WSA generates. This can be achieved by manually installing the root certificate on the endpoint, or by using a group policy or a certificate management system to distribute the root certificate to the endpoints.

D. The root certificate that the WSA uses to decrypt HTTPS traffic does not have to be signed by an internal CA. The WSA can generate its own self-signed root certificate, or it can use a root certificate that is signed by an external CA. However, the root certificate must be trusted by the endpoints, as explained in option C.

References := : WSA Certificate Usage for HTTPS Decryption : [User Guide for AsyncOS 12.0 for Cisco Web Security Appliances - GD (General Deployment) - Create Decryption Policies to Control HTTPS Traffic]

AES encryption is a symmetric block cipher algorithm that uses a single key to encrypt and decrypt data. It is more secure than 3DES, which is an older and slower algorithm that encrypts and decrypts a key three times in sequence. AES can use different key sizes, such as 128, 192, or 256 bits, depending on the security level required. The longer the key, the more rounds of encryption and decryption are performed, making it harder to break. AES encryption is based on a substitution-permutation network, which consists of a series of operations that transform the input data into the output data using the key. References :=

https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/cryptography-tutorial/aes-encryption

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Encryption_Standard

To prevent rogue NTP servers from inserting themselves as the authoritative time source, the administrator needs to configure NTP authentication and specify the interface for syncing to the NTP server. NTP authentication allows the ASA to verify the identity and integrity of the NTP packets received from the server, using a shared secret key. Specifying the interface for syncing to the NTP server ensures that the ASA uses the correct source address for sending and receiving NTP packets, and avoids potential routing issues. The other options are not required or relevant for this task. Specifying the NTP version is optional and does not affect security. Configuring the NTP stratum is only applicable for NTP servers, not clients. The ASA can only act as an NTP client, not a server. Setting the NTP DNS hostname is not recommended, as it introduces a dependency on DNS resolution and may cause synchronization problems if the DNS server changes the IP address of the NTP server. References :=

Some possible references are:

Configure NTP Authentication on Secure Network Analytics

CLI Book 1: Cisco ASA Series General Operations CLI Configuration Guide, 9.6 - Basic Settings

Cisco ASA NTP and Clock Configuration with Examples

When the Cisco Secure Firewall downloads threat intelligence updates from Cisco Talos, it is engaged in " consumption. " This term refers to the process of receiving and utilizing threat intelligence data to enhance security measures. Cisco Talos provides comprehensive threat intelligence that Cisco Secure Firewall consumes to update its threat detection and prevention capabilities.

 A SYN flood is a type of denial-of-service (DoS) attack that exploits the TCP three-way handshake process to exhaust the resources of a target server. The attacker sends a large number of SYN packets to the target server, each with a spoofed source IP address. The target server allocates resources for each incoming SYN packet and responds with a SYN-ACK packet to the spoofed address. However, the spoofed address never sends back the final ACK packet to complete the connection, leaving the target server with many half-open connections that eventually fill up its connection table. This prevents the target server from accepting new legitimate connections and causes service disruption123 References: 1: Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR) v1.0 course overview 2: SYN Flood Explained. How to Prevent this Attack from Taking over your … 3: What is a SYN flood attack? | Cloudflare

A SQL injection attack is a type of attack that exploits a vulnerability in a web application that uses user-supplied data to construct SQL statements that interact with a database. By inserting malicious commands into the database, an attacker can execute arbitrary SQL queries or commands on the database server, which may result in data theft, data manipulation, or command execution. Machine 1 is vulnerable to SQL injection because it does not properly validate or sanitize the user input before using it in a SQL statement. Therefore, inserting malicious commands into the database would allow the attacker to gain access to machine 1.

A buffer overflow attack is a type of attack that exploits a vulnerability in a program that does not check the boundaries of a buffer (a temporary storage area for data) before copying data into it. By overflowing the buffer’s memory, an attacker can overwrite adjacent memory locations, which may result in corrupting data, crashing the program, or executing malicious code. Machine 2 is vulnerable to buffer overflow because it does not properly handle the size or length of the data that it receives from the user or another source. Therefore, overflowing the buffer’s memory would allow the attacker to gain access to machine 2.

Sniffing the packets between the two hosts is a passive attack that involves capturing and analyzing the network traffic that flows between the two machines. This attack may reveal sensitive information, such as credentials, session tokens, or database queries, but it does not directly allow the attacker to gain access to either machine. Sending continuous pings is a type of denial-of-service attack that involves flooding the target machine with ICMP echo request packets, which may consume its network bandwidth or processing resources, but it does not directly allow the attacker to gain access to either machine. Therefore, neither sniffing the packets nor sending continuous pings would allow the attacker to gain access to machine 1 but not machine 2. References :=

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR) v1.0, Module 3: Web Security, SQL Injection Attacks

Understanding SQL Injection - Cisco, SQL Injection Explained

Buffer Overflow and SQL Injection: To Remotely Attack and … - Springer, Buffer Overflow and SQL Injection Attacks

EPP and EDR are two types of endpoint security solutions that have different goals and capabilities. EPP stands for endpoint protection platform, which is a suite of technologies that work together to prevent, detect, and remediate security threats on endpoints. EPP solutions use techniques such as antivirus, firewall, application control, and patch management to block known and unknown malware and malicious activity. EDR stands for endpoint detection and response, which is a solution that provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities and enables security teams to detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats that may have bypassed EPP defenses. EDR solutions use techniques such as behavioral analysis, threat intelligence, and incident response to flag offending files at the first sign of malicious behavior, contain and isolate compromised endpoints, and remediate the damage caused by the attack. Therefore, the correct answer is D, as having an EDR solution gives an engineer the capability to flag offending files at the first sign of malicious behavior. The other options are incorrect because:

A is false, as EPP focuses primarily on threats that have evaded front-line defenses that entered the environment, not EDR.

B is false, as having an EPP solution allows an engineer to detect, investigate, and remediate modern threats, not EDR.

C is false, as EDR focuses on detection and response at the endpoint level, not prevention at the perimeter. References:

EPP vs. EDR: Why You Need Both - CrowdStrike

EDR vs EPP: What is the Difference? - Exabeam

EPP vs. EDR: What Matters More, Prevention or Response? - Cynet

 The monitoring agent uses the RTP (Real-time Transport Protocol) performance metric to collect and output packet loss and jitter information. RTP is a network protocol used for delivering audio and video over IP networks. It provides mechanisms for timestamping, sequence numbering, and delivery monitoring, which allow for the measurement of packet loss and jitter. RTP is specifically designed for real-time multimedia streaming applications, which are more sensitive to changes in the transmission characteristics of data networks than other applications. Therefore, RTP performance is a suitable metric for monitoring and collecting packet loss and jitter information.

The other options are not directly related to measuring packet loss and jitter. TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is a transport protocol that ensures reliable and ordered delivery of data, but it is not typically used for real-time multimedia applications. WSAv (Web Security Virtual Appliance) is a Cisco solution for web security, but it does not measure packet loss and jitter. AVC (Application Visibility and Control) is a technology that monitors and controls network applications, but it does not focus on packet loss and jitter. References :=

Measuring Delay, Jitter, and Packet Loss with Cisco IOS SAA and RTTMON1

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR) v1.02

Cisco 350-701: Which metric used by monitoring agent to collect and output packet loss and jitter information?

To share data between multiple security products, you must use Cisco Platform Exchange Grid (pxGrid). pxGrid is an open and scalable framework that allows for bi-directional any-to-any partner platform integrations. pxGrid uses REST and WebSocket interfaces to exchange intelligence and obtain contextual information from Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and other security products. pxGrid can also direct ISE to contain threats by setting network policies. pxGrid enables cross-platform network system collaboration across your IT infrastructure and helps you monitor security, detect threats, and manage assets, configuration, identity, and access. References: Introduction to the Cisco Platform Exchange Grid (pxGrid) in ISE, Cisco Identity Services Engine Administrator Guide, Release 3.3

 The RADIUS CoA feature supports five IETF attributes as defined in RFC 5176. These are:

Event-Timestamp: This attribute indicates the time when the CoA request was generated by the server.

State: This attribute contains a value that is copied from the Access-Accept message that authorized the session.

Session-Timeout: This attribute specifies the maximum number of seconds of service provided to the user before termination of the session or prompt.

Idle-Timeout: This attribute specifies the maximum number of consecutive seconds of idle connection allowed to the user before termination of the session or prompt.

Filter-Id: This attribute identifies the filter list to be applied to the user session.

The RADIUS CoA feature also supports vendor-specific attributes (VSAs) that are defined by Cisco or other vendors. These VSAs can be used to perform additional actions such as port shutdown, port bounce, or security and password accounting. References :=

Some possible references are:

RFC 5176: This document describes the dynamic authorization extensions to RADIUS, including the CoA request and response codes, and the supported IETF attributes.

RADIUS Change of Authorization - Cisco: This document provides the configuration guide for the RADIUS CoA feature on Cisco IOS devices, including the supported IETF and Cisco VSAs.

Supported IETF attributes in RFC 5176 - Ruckus Networks: This document lists the supported IETF attributes and error clause values for the RADIUS CoA feature on Ruckus devices.

V